Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical expressions of conditional mean, covariance, and sample functions in geostatistics

  • Originals
  • Published:
Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents analytical expressions for the best estimate, conditional covariance function, and conditional realizations of a function from sparse observations. In contrast to the prevalent approach in kriging where the best estimates at every point are determined from the solution of a system of linear equations, the best-estimate function can be represented analytically in terms of basis functions, whose number depends on the observations. This approach is computationally superior when graphing a function estimate and is also valuable in understanding what the solution should look like. For example, one can immediately see that all “singularities” in the best-estimate function are at observation points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cressie, N.A.C. 1993: Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition, 900 pp., J. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boor, C. 1992: Spline Toolbox User's Guide, The MathWorks, Natick, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubrule, O. 1983: Two methods with different objectives: Splines and kriging, Math. Geology 15(2), 245–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutjahr, A.; Bullard, B.; Hatch, S.; Hughson, L. 1994: Joint conditional simulations and the spectral approach for flow modeling, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 8(1), 79–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, R.L. 1990: Theory and applications of the multiquadric-biharmonic method: 20 years of discovery, Computers Math. Applic. 19(8/9), 163–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimeldorf, G.; Wahba, G. 1970: A correspondence between Bayesian estimation of stochastic processes and smoothing by splines, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, 495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis, P.K. 1986: Parameter uncertainty in estimation of spatial functions: Bayesian analysis, Water Resour. Res. 22(4), 499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis, P.K. 1993: Generalized covariance functions in estimation, Mathematical Geology 25(5), 525–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. 1971: The Theory of Regionalized Variables and Its Applications, Centre de Morphologie Mathematique de Fontainebleau

  • Matheron, G. 1981: Splines and kriging: Their formal equivalence, in Down-To-Earth Statistics: Solutions Looking for Geological Problems, edited by D.F. Merriam, pp. 77–95, Syracuse Univ. Geological Contributions, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Micchelli, C.A. 1986: Interpolation of scattered data: Distance matrices and conditionally positive definite functions, Constructive Approximation 2, 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, G. 1988: Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 505 pp., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G.S. 1984: Smoothing and interpolation by kriging and with splines, Math. Geology 16(6), 601–615

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitanidis, P.K. Analytical expressions of conditional mean, covariance, and sample functions in geostatistics. Stochastic Hydrol Hydraul 10, 279–294 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581870

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581870

Key words

Navigation