Skip to main content
Log in

Pyroclastic phases of a rhyolitic dome-building eruption: Puketarata tuff ring, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand

  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 14 ka Puketarata eruption of Maroa caldera in Taupo Volcanic Zone was a dome-related event in which the bulk of the 0.25 km3 of eruption products were emplaced as phreatomagmatic fall and surge deposits. A rhyolitic dike encountered shallow groundwater during emplacement along a NE-trending normal fault, leading to shallow-seated explosions characterised by low to moderate water/magma ratios. The eruption products consist of two lava domes, a proximal tuff ring, three phreatic collapse craters, and a widespread fall deposit. The pyroclastic deposits contain dominantly dense juvenile clasts and few foreign lithics, and relate to very shallow-level disruption of the growing dome and its feeder dike with relatively little involvement of country rock. The distal fall deposit, representing 88% of the eruption products is, despite its uniform appearance and apparently subplinian dispersal, a composite feature equivalent to numerous discrete proximal phreatomagmatic lapilli fall layers, each deposited from a short-lived eruption column. The Puketarata products are subdivided into four units related to successive phases of:(A) shallow lava intrusion and initial dome growth; (B) rapid growth and destruction of dome lobes; (C) slower, sustained dome growth and restriction of explosive disruption to the dome margins; and (D) post-dome withdrawal of magma and crater-collapse. Phase D was phreatic, phases A and C had moderate water: magma ratios, and phase B a low water: magma ratio. Dome extrusion was most rapid during phase B, but so was destruction, and hence dome growth was largely accomplished during phase C. The Puketarata eruption illustrates how vent geometry and the presence of groundwater may control the style of silicic volcanism. Early activity was dominated by these external influences and sustained dome growth only followed after effective exclusion of external water from newly emplaced magma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake S (1990) Viscoplastic models of lava domes. In: Fink JH (ed) Lava flows and domes. Springer, New York, 88–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker MR (1988) The geology of the puketarata tuff ring and domes, Maroa Volcanic Centre. Unpublished BSc (Hons) thesis, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Eichelberger JC, Carrigan CR, Westrich HR, Price RH (1986) Non-explosive silicic volcanism. Nature 323:598–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Forggatt PC, Lowe DJ (1990) A review of late Quaternary silicic and some other tephra formations from New Zealand: their stratigraphy, nomenclature, distribution, volume and age. NZ J Geol Geophys 33:89–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiken GH (1978) Plinian-type eruptions in the Medicine Lake Highland, California and nature of the underlying magma. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 4:375–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiken GH, Eichelberger J (1980) Eruptions at Chaos Crags, Lassen National Park, California. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 7:443–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiken GH, Wohletz KH (1987) Tephra deposits associated with silicic domes and lava flows. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 212:55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton BF, Wilson CJN (1989) A vesicularity index for pyroclastic deposits. Bull Volcanol 51:451–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd EF (1972) Geology and hot springs of Orakeikorako. NZ Geol Surv Bull 85

  • Newhall CG, Melson WG (1983) Explosive activity associated with the growth of volcanic domes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 17:111–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle DM (1989) The thickness volume and grainsize of tephra fall deposits. Bull Volcanol 51:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan MF, Marshall JR (1983) Interpretation of pyroclastic surface features using SEM images. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 16:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieh K, Bursik M (1986) Most recent eruptions of the Mono Craters, eastern central California. J Geophys Res 91:12539–12571

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson DA, Dzurisin D, Holcomb RT, Iwatsubo EY, Chadwick WW, Casadevall TJ, Ewert JW, Heliker CC (1987) Growth of the lava dome at Mount St Helens, Washington (USA), 1981–1983. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 212:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker GPL (1980) The Taupo Pumice: product of the most powerful known (ultraplinian) eruption? J Volcanol Geotherm Res 8:69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker GPL (1983) Ignimbrite types and ignimbrite problems. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 17:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohletz KH (1983) Mechanisms of hydrovolcanic pyroclast formation: grain-size, scanning electron microscopy, and experimental studies. J. Volcanol Geotherm Res 17:31–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooker, M.R., Houghton, B.F., Wilson, C.J.N. et al. Pyroclastic phases of a rhyolitic dome-building eruption: Puketarata tuff ring, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 55, 395–406 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301999

Key words

Navigation