Summary
In a mature, even aged stand of mixed chaparral, Rhus laurina (facultative resprouter) had consistently higher water potentials and deeper roots than Ceanothus spinosus (facultative resprouter) and Ceanothus megacarpus (obligate seeder). For two years following a wildfire, the same stand of chaparral had resprouts with higher survivorships, predawn water potentials, stomatal conductances, photosynthetic rates and shoot elongation rates than seedlings. Supplemental irrigation of seedlings during summer months removed differences between resprouts and seedlings suggesting that the cause of such differences was limited water availability to the shoot tissues of seedlings. After two years of postfire regrowth, mean seedling survivorship for the obligate seeder (C. megacarpus) was 42%, whereas seedling survivorship for facultative resprouters was only 18% (C. spinosus) and 0.01% (R. laurina). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that lack of resprouting ability among obligate seeders is offset by an enhanced ability to establish seedlings after wildfire, allowing obligate seeders to maintain themselves in mixed populations through many fire cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod DI (1989) Age and origin of chaparral. In: Keeley SC (ed) The California Chaparral: Paradigms Reexamined. Natural History Museum of LA County, Science Series 34:7–19
Carpenter RL, Recher HF (1979) Pollination, reproduction, and fire. Am Nat 113:871–879
Chazdon RL, Field CB (1987) Photographic estimation of photosynthetically active radiation: evaluation of a computerized technique. Oecologia 73:525–532
Christian KA, Tracy CR (1985) Measuring air temperature in field studies. J Therm Biol 10:55–56
Davis SD (1989) Patterns in mixed chaparral stands: differential water status and seedling survival during summer drought. In: Keeley SC (ed) The California Chaparral: Paradigms Reexamined. Natural History Museum of LA County, Science Series 34: 97–105
Davis SD, Mooney HA (1986) Water use patterns of four cooccurring chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 70:172–177
Desouza J, Silka PA, Davis SD (1986) Comparative physiology of burned and unburned Rhus laurina after chaparral wildfire. Oecologia 71:63–68
Frazer J, Davis SD (1988) Differential survival of chaparral seedlings during the first summer drought following wildfire. Oecologia 76:215–221
Jacks PM (1984) The drought tolerance of Adenostoma fasiculatum and Ceanothus crassifolius seedlings and vegetation change in the San Gabriel Mountains. MS thesis. San Diego State Univ, CA, p 86
Keeley JE (1977) Seed production, seed populations in soil, and seedling production after fire for two congeneric pairs of sprouting and nonsprouting chaparral shrubs. Ecology 58:820–829
Keeley JE (1986) Resilience of mediterranean shrub communities to fire. pp 95–112. In: Dell B (ed) Resilience of Mediterranean Ecosystems. Dr W. Junk, New York
Keeley JE, Keeley SC (1988) Chaparral. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD (eds) North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–207
Keeley JE, Zedler PH (1978) Reproduction of chaparral shrubs after fire: a comparison of sprouting and seedling strategies. Am Midl Nat 99:142–161
Kummerow JD, Krause D, Jow W (1977) Root systems of chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 29:163–177
Kummerow J, Ellis BA, Mills JN (1985) Post-fire seedling establishment of Adenostoma fasciculatum and Ceanothus greggii in southern California chaparral. Madrono 32:148–157
Mahall BE, Schlesinger WH (1982) Effects of irradiance on growth, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency of seedlings of the chaparral shrub Ceanothus megacarpus. Oecologia 54:291–299
Mills JN (1983) Herbivory and seedling establishment in post-fire southern California chaparral. Oecologia 60:267–270
Munz PA (1974) A flora of southern California. Univ Calif Press, Berkeley, CA, p 1086
Musick HB (1972) Post-fire seedling ecology of two Ceanothus species in relation to slope exposure. MA thesis, Univ Calif Santa Barbara, p 22
Oechel WC, Hastings SJ (1983) The effects of fire on photosynthesis in chaparral resprouts. In: Druger FJ, Mitchell DT, Jarvis JUM (eds) Med-Type Ecosystems: The Role of Nutrients. Springer, New York, pp 274–285
Plumb TR (1961) Sprouting of chaparral by December after a wildfire in July. US Forest Serv, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp Sta Tec Paper 57, p 12
Radosevich SR, Conard SG (1980) Physiological control of chamise shoot growth after fire. Am J Bot 67:1442–1447
Raven PH (1977) The California Flora. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial Vegetation of California. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 109–137
Sampson AW (1944) Plant succession on burned chaparral lands in Northern California. Univ Calif Agric Stn Bull No 685, p 144
Schlesinger WH, Gray JT, Gill DS, Mahall BE (1982) Ceanothus megacarpus chaparral: a synthesis of ecosystem processes during development and annual growth. Bot Rev 48:47–117
Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco, p 859
Weibe HH, Brown RW (1979) Temperature gradient effects on in situ hygrometer measurements of soil water. Agron J 71:397–401
Weibe HH, Brown RW, Barker J (1977) Temperature gradient effects on in situ hygrometer measurements of water potential. Agron J 69:933–939
Wells PV (1969) The relation between mode of reproduction and extent of speciation in woody genera of the California chaparral. Evol 23:264–267
Zedler PH, Gautier CR, McMaster GS (1983) Vegetation change in response to extreme events: the effect of a short interval between fires in California chaparral and coastal scrub. Ecology 64:809–818
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, C.M., Davis, S.D. Recovery patterns of three chaparral shrub species after wildfire. Oecologia 80, 309–320 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379032
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379032