Skip to main content
Log in

Biochemical analysis of toxic effects of 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine in mammalian cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Cellular and biochemical analyses of the toxic effects of the thymidine analog, 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (hmdUrd), were carried out using V79.5 Chinese hamster cells. It was found that the toxic effects of hmdUrd could be totally suppressed by the addition of thymidine at 1/10th the concentration of hmdUrd. When other pyrimidines were tested, deoxyuridine was found to also suppress toxicity, although not as well as thymidine, while orotate, uridine, cytidine, and deoxycytidine did not have significant effect. Biochemical analyses of the metabolic fate of hmdUrd demonstrated low but significant levels of hmdUrd triphosphate and the incorporation of 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmUra) residues into DNA. Surprisingly, in addition to these metabolites, relatively high levels of free hmUra were also detected in the acid-soluble cell extracts. Further analysis demonstrated that when V79.5 cells were exposed to hmdUrd significant amounts of hmUra were released into the culture medium. In vitro assays provided evidence that hmdUrd was first phosphorylated to its monophosphate and then degraded to hmUra, possibly via the action of a new enzyme, hydroxymethyldeoxyuridylate phosphorylase. Exposure of cells to hmUra alone, at concentrations as high as 3 mM, had no effect on viability. However, when V79.5 cells were simultaneously exposed to low, nontoxic concentrations of hmdUrd and high, nontoxic concentrations of hmUra, a synergistic reduction in viability was observed. This synergistic effect was found to correlate with increased incorporation of hmUra into DNA, possibly via end-product inhibition of an hmUra-DNA glycosylase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Kallen, R.G., Simon, M., and Marmur, J. (1962).J. Mol. Biol. 5:248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rae, P.M.M. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:1141–1145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rae, P.M.M. (1976).Science 194:1062–1064.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufman, E.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:649–661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waschke, S., Reefschlager, J., Barwolff, D., and Langen, P. (1975).Nature 255:629–630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthes, E., Barwolff, D., Preussel, B., and Langen, P. (1979). InAntimetabolites in Biochemistry, Biology and Medicine, (eds.). Skoda, J., and Langen, P. (eds.). (Pergamon Press, Oxford), pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cadet, J., and Teoule, R. (1975).Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 3–4:891–895.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Myers, L.S., Jr., Ward, J.F., Tsukamoto, W.T., Holmes, D.E., and Julca, J.R. (1965).Science 148:1234–1235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teebor, G.W., Frenkel, K., and Goldstein, M.S. (1982).Adv. Enzyme Regul. 20:39–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Teebor, G.W., Frenkel, K., and Goldstein, M.S. (1984).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81:318–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollstein, M.C., Brooks, P., Linn, S., and Ames, B.N. (1984).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81:4003–4007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford, D.K., and Yerganian, G. (1958).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21:393–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kit, S., Dubbs, D.R., Piekarski, L.J., and Hsu, T.C. (1963).Exp. Cell Res. 31:297–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khym, J.X. (1975).Clin. Chem. N.Y. 21:1245–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adelstein, S.J., Baldwin, C., and Kohn, H.I. (1971).Dev. Biol. 26:537–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, G. (1964).Exp. Cell Res. 36:422–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao, F.T., and Puck, T.T. (1968).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60:1275–1281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, S.S., Flaks, J.G., Barner, H.D., Loeb, M.R., and Lichtenstein, J. (1958).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 44:1004–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wataya, Y., Santi, D.V., and Hansch, C. (1977).J. Med. Chem. 20:1469–1473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufman, E.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1979).Exp. Cell Res. 123:355–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Danenberg, P.V. (1977).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 473:73–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindahl, T. (1982).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 51:61–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, E.R. Biochemical analysis of toxic effects of 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine in mammalian cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 12, 501–512 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539921

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539921

Keywords

Navigation