Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical Formalism and Characteristics of Four Basic Models of Indirect Pharmacodynamic Responses for Drug Infusions

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indirect response models require differential equations to describe the nonlinear inhibition or stimulation of the production or loss (kout ) of the response variable. Partially integrated solutions for these models developed previously for iv bolus or biphasic pharmacokinetics were extended to consider drug infusions for limited or extended durations. Qualitative examination was made of the role of infusion rate and duration, type and rate of drug disposition, Imax or Smax capacity factors, IC50 or SC50 sensitivity factors, and kout values. Properties of the response curves characterized include curve shapes, maximum or minimum response, onset rate, steady-state, and return to baseline. Some comparisons were made with behavior of iv bolus doses. These relationships provide both a formal and practical basis for better understanding of the time-course of basic indirect response models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. L. Dayneka, V. Garg, and W. J. Jusko. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:457–478 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. Jusko and H. C. Ko. Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:406–419 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Sharma and W. J. Jusko. Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 24:611–635 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Krzyzanski and W. J. Jusko. Mathematical formalism for the properties of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 25:107–123 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. D. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-turbocurarine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358–371 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gabrielsson and D. Weiner. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed., Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, Stockholm, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. W. J. Olver. Asymptotics and Special Functions. Academic Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krzyzanski, W., Jusko, W.J. Mathematical Formalism and Characteristics of Four Basic Models of Indirect Pharmacodynamic Responses for Drug Infusions. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 26, 385–408 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021060000789

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021060000789

Navigation