Skip to main content
Log in

Exploitation and Growth

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I develop a model of exploitation—coercive wealthtransfer—and growth based on social importance. Exploitationreduces growth since the return to capital falls with exploitationcosts. Initial relative wealth across groups—the measureof social importance—determines which group is the exploiterand how costly exploitation will be. The exploiter selects anexploitation path that maintains its dominant position and rarelymaximizes current transfers. Productive minorities and fast-growinggroups are most prone to exploitation. International sanctions,if strong, end exploitation; otherwise they increase exploitationand reduce growth. Segregation and apartheid are broadly consistentwith the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., and D. Rodrik. (1994). “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R. (1996). “Inequality and Growth.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996, 11–92.

  • Benhabib, J., and A. Rustichini. (1996). “Social Conflict and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Federalist. (1961). Edited by Jacob Cooke. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961 (1787–1788).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, K., and J. Markakis. (1994). Ethnicity and Conflict in the Horn of Africa. London: Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics.” Review of Economic Studies 60, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H., and M. Kim. (1995). “Swords or Plowshares? A Theory of the Security of Property Rights.” Journal of Political Economy 103, 1275–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H., and M. Kim. (1996a). “Predation and Accumulation.” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H., and M. Kim. (1996b). “Predation and Moral Decay.” Brown University Working Paper.

  • Higgs, R. (1977). Competition and Coercion: Blacks in the American Economy, 1865–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1995). “Anarchy and Its Breakdown.” Journal of Political Economy 103, 26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, W. H. (1964). The Economics of the Colour Bar, London: Deutch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, K. (1996). “Lessons from Growth and Structural Change in the Second-Tier South East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries.” Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

  • Laban, R., and F. Sturzenegger. (1994). “Distributional Conflict, Financial Adaptation, and Delayed Stabilization.” Economics and Politics 6, 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, René. (1970). Rwanda and Burundi. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, Matts. (1992). Apartheid in Theory and Practice: An Economic Analysis. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (1787). “Federalist No. 10.” In The Federalist, edited by Jacob E. Cooke. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M., and M. Olson. (1996). “The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule.” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 72–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1962). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1993). “Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution, and Growth.” Review of Economic Studies 60, 755–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say.” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 149–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review 84, 600–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1992). “Growth in Open Economics.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 36, 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, S. (1992). “Cooperation, Conflict, and Power in the Absence of Property Rights.” American Economic Review 82, 720–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, Thomas. (1983). The Economics and Politics of Race. New York: Morrow, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A., and A. Velasco. (1992). “The Tragedy of the Commons and Economic Growth: Why Does Capital Flow from Rich to Rich Countries?” Journal of Political Economy 100, 1208–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, J. (1981). “Might Makes Rights: A Theory of the Formation and Initial Distribution of Property Rights.” Economic Inquiry 19, 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. V. (1974). The Strange Career of Jim Crow, 3-d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDermott, J. Exploitation and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 251–278 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009730825259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009730825259

Navigation