Abstract
Experiments were conducted to (1) determine whether the electroantennogram (EAG) can detect differences among the responses of antennae from males derived from the three strains ofOstrinia nubilalis (Hübner), and (2) characterize the EAG responses of each strain to isomeric forms of the natural pheromone, (E)- and (Z)-11-tetradecen-1-ol acetate (TDA), and analogs possessing differences in the terminal alkyl group, cyclopropyl (CPA), ortert-butyl (TBA).
EAG responses differed among the strains in two ways: (1) Antennae fromZZ males always produced an EAG to (Z)-TDA with an extended duration of response. This “signature” EAG response was found to be unique to the antennal response ofZZ males to (Z)-TDA, thus providing a relatively easy method of distinguishing liveZZ males fromEE orZE males. Correlated with this longer EAG response was a longer disadaptation time, i.e., the EAG response ofZZ antennae disadapted more slowly (ca. 10 min) than the response ofEE antennae. (2) Strain differences in the relative EAG amplitudes to isomers and analogs were observed at the stimulus amounts eliciting the peak EAG amplitude as follows: TDA ≥ CPA > TBA forZZ males and both isomers; TDA > CPA ≥ TBA and CPA ≥ TDA > TBA forEE males and theE andZ isomers, respectively; CPA > TBA ≥ TDA forZE males and both isomers. Dose—response relationships were seen for all compounds if amplitude (“peak height”) of the EAG was used as a measure of response. However, if width of the EAG at half the peak height (“peak width”) was used, then only theZZ antennal response to (Z)-TDA resulted in a meaningful dose-response relationship. For all strains, the EAG amplitudes elicited by theZ isomers of any of the tested compounds were greater than those elicited by the correspondingE isomers. Therefore, correlations between the relative EAG and upwind flight responses were observed in theZZ (r = 0.86) andZE (r = 0.80) strains but were not correlated in theEE strain (r = 0.18). Temporal studies showed that adaptation, not postexcision deterioration, was responsible for the observed decreases in the EAG amplitude after repetitive stimulation or after stimulation with amounts in a descending order. Disa-daptation required at least 20 min for a moderate dose (10 μg for 1 sec). Developmental studies showed that antennae from 2-day-old adults had the greatest EAG response.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bestmann, H.J., andVostrowsky, O. 1982. Structure-activity relationships in insect pheromones. A dynamic model of pheromone interactions with receptor sites, pp. 253–263,in W. Breiphohl (ed.). Olfaction and Endocrine Regulations. IRL Press, London.
Bestmann, H.J., Hirsch, H.L, Platz, H., andVostrowsky, O. 1980. Differentiation between chiral pheromone analogues by chemoreceptors.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 19:475–477.
Chapman, O.L., Klun, J.A., Mattes, K.C., Sheridan, R.S., andMaini, S. 1978a. Chemoreceptors in Lepidoptera: Stereochemical differentiation of dual receptors for an achiral pheromone.Science 201:926–928.
Chapman, O.L., Mattes, K.C., Sheridan, R.S., andKlun, J.A. 1978b. Stereochemical evidence of dual chemoreceptors for an archiral pheromone.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100:4878–4884.
Frazier, J.L., andHanson, F.E. 1986. Electrophysiological recording and analysis of insect chemosensory responses, pp. 285–330,in J.R. Miller, and T.A. Miller (eds.). Insect-Plant Interactions. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hansson, B.S., Löfstedt, C., andRoelofs, W.L. 1987. Inheritance of olfactory response to sex pheromone components inOstrinia nubilalis.Naturwissenschaften 74:497–499.
Jones, D. 1984. Use, misuse, and role of multiple-comparison procedures in ecological and agricultural entomology.Environ. Entomol. 13:635–649.
Kaissling, K.-E. 1971. Insect olfaction, pp. 351–431,in M. Beidler (ed.). Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV, Chemical Senses, Part 1. Olfaction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Kaissung, K.-E. 1974. Sensory transduction in insect olfactory receptors, pp. 243–273,in L. Jaenicke (ed.). Biochemistry of Sensory Functions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Kaissling, K.-E. 1976. The problem of specificity in olfactory cells, pp. 137–148,in G. Benz (ed.). Structure-Activity Relationships in Chemoreception, ECRO Symposium, Wädenswil. Information Retrieval, London.
Kaissling, K.-E. 1977. Control of insect behavior via chemoreceptor organs, pp. 45–66,in H.H. Shorey and J.J. McKelvey, Jr. (eds.). Chemical Control of Insect Behavior. Theory and Application. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Kaissling, K.-E., andThorson, J. 1980. Insect olfactory sensilla: Structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization, pp. 261–282,in D.B. Sattelle, L.M. Hall, and J.G. Hildebrand (eds.). Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones and Pheromones in Insects. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York.
Klun, J.A., andHuetell, M.D. 1988. Genetic regulation of sex pheromone production and response: Interaction of sympatric pheromonal types of the European corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:2047–2061.
Klun, J.A., andMaini, S. 1979. Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system: The European com borer.Environ. Entomol. 8:423–426.
Klun, J.A., andRobinson, J.F. 1972. Olfactory discrimination in the European corn borer and several pheromonally analogous moths.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:1337–1340.
Klun, J.A., Chapman, O.L., Mattes, K.C., Wojtkowski, P.W., Beroza, M., andSonnet, P.E. 1973. Insect sex pheromones: Minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction.Science 181:661–663.
Klun, J.A., Maini, S., Chapman, O.L., Lepone, G., andLee, G.-H. 1979. Suppression of male European corn borer sex attraction and precopulatory reactions with (E)-9-tetradecenyl acetate.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:345–352.
Kochansky, J., Cardé, R.T., Liebherr, J., andRoelofs, W.L. 1975. Sex pheromone of the European corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in New York.J. Chem. Ecol. 1:225–231.
Liljefors, T., Thelin, B., andvander Pers, J.N.C. 1984. Structure-activity relationships between stimulus molecule and response of a pheromone receptor cell in turnip moth,Agrotis segetum. Modifications of the acetate group.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1661–1675.
Liljefors, T., Bengtsson, M., andHansson, B.S. 1987. Effects of double-bond configuration on interaction between a moth sex pheromone component and its receptor.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2023–2040.
Mayer, M.S., andMankin, R.W. 1985. Neurobiology of pheromone perception, pp. 95–144,in G.A. Kerkut, and L.I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Pergamon Press, New York.
Mayer, M.S., Mankin, R.W., andLemire, G.F. 1984. Quantitation of the insect electroantennogram: Measurement of sensillar contributions, elimination of background potentials, and relationship to olfactory sensation.J. Insect Physiol. 30:757–763.
Nagai, T. 1983. On the relationship between the electroantennogram and simultaneously recorded single sensillum response of the European corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis.Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1:85–91.
Nagai, T., Starratt, A.N., McCleod, D.G.R., andDriscoll, G.R. 1977. Electroantennogram responses of the European corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis, to (Z)- and (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetates.J. Insect Physiol. 23:591–597.
Payne, T.L., Shorey, H.H., andGaston, L.K. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths: factors influencing antennal responsiveness in males ofTrochoplusia ni.J. Insect Physiol. 16:1043–1055.
Priesner, E. 1979. Specificity studies on pheromone receptors in noctuid and tortricid Lepidoptera, pp. 57–71,in F.J. Ritter (ed.). Chemical Ecology: Odour Communications in Animals. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam.
Priesner, E., Jacobson, M., andBestmann, H.J. 1975. Structure-response relationships in noctuid sex pheromone reception.Z. Naturforsch. 30c:283–293.
Reed, G.L., Showers, W.B., Huggans, J.L., andCarter, S.W. 1972. Improved procedures for mass rearing the European corn borer.J. Econ. Entomol. 65:1472–1476.
Roelofs, W.L. 1977. The scope and limitations of the electroantennogram technique in identifying pheromone components, pp. 147–165,in N.R. McFarlane (ed.). Crop Protection Agents—Their Biological Evaluation. Academic Press, New York.
Roelofs, W.L., andComeau, A. 1971. Sex pheromone perception: Electroantennogram responses of the red-banded leaf roller moth.J. Insect Physiol. 17:1969–1982.
Rumbo, E.R. 1988. Cross- and self-adaptation of electroantennogram responses in the lightbrown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana).J. Insect Physiol. 34:117–123.
Sas Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
Sas Institute. 1987. SAS/GRAPH Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
Schneider, D. 1962. Electrophysiological investigation on the olfactory specificity of sexual attracting substances in different species of moths.J. Insect Physiol. 8:15–30.
Schwarz, M., Graminski, G.F., andWaters, R.M. 1986. Insect sex pheromones. Stereospecific synthesis of (E)-13,13-dimethyl-11-tetradecen-1-ol acetate via thiophenol-mediated olefin inversion.J. Org. Chem. 51:260–263.
Schwarz, M., Klun, J.A., Fritz, G.L., Uebel, E.C., andRaina, A.K. 1989. European corn borer sex pheromone: Structure-activity relationships.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:601–617.
Schweitzer, E.S., Sanes, J.R., andHildebrand, J.G. 1976. Ontogeny of electroantennogram responses in the mothManduca sexta.J. Insect Physiol. 22:955–960.
Seabrook, W.D., Hirai, K., Shorey, H.H., andGaston, L.K. 1979. Maturation and senescence of an insect chemosensory response.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:587–594.
Steel, R.G.D., andTorrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Tolbert, L.P., Matsumoto, S.G., andHildebrand, J.G. 1983. Development of synapses in the antennal lobes of the mothManduca sexta during metamorphosis.J. Neurosci. 3:1158–1157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fescemyer, H.W., Hanson, F.E. Male european corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), antennal responses to analogs of its sex pheromone. J Chem Ecol 16, 773–790 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016488
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016488