Skip to main content
Log in

Relations Between Stock Returns and Fundamental Variables: Evidence from a Segmented Market

  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines relations between stock returns and potential explanatory factors in Korea, an important and segmented emerging market. Our results show that Korean stock returns in general and returns on stocks listed in Section 1 in particular are significantly positively related to book-to-market, sales-price, and debt-equity ratios, but not significantly related to market value of equity. Returns on stocks listed in Section 2 are, however, negatively related to market value of equity and not significantly related to the other three variables. Among the variables investigated by us, book-to-market ratio has the greatest explanatory power for stock returns and it indicates superior returns for value stocks. Our findings strengthen the international evidence of the role of book-to-market ratio in explaining stock returns by demonstrating its significance even in the segmented Korean market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, W. and Jagtiani, J. (1994) Foreign ownership restrictions and stock prices in the Thai capital market, J. Financ. Econom. 36, 57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banz, R.W. (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, J. Financ. Econom. 9, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbee, W. C., Mukherji, S., and Raines, G. A. (1996) Do the sales-price and debt-equity ratios explain stock returns better than the book-to-market value of equity ratio and firm size? Financ. Analysts J. 52, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1977) The investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis, J. Finance 32, 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. and Chan, K. (1995) The profitability of technical trading rules in the Asian stock markets, Pacific-Basin Finance J. 3, 257–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, L. C. (1988) Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence, J. Finance 43, 507–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caires, B. de and Fletter, D., (eds) (1990) Guide to World Equity Markets, Euromoney Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaul, C., Rowley, I., and Sharpe, W. F. (1993) International value and growth stock returns, Financ. Analysts J. 49, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K. C., Hamao, Y., and Lakonishok, J. (1991) Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan, J. Finance 46, 1739–1764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. S. and Lee, J. (1993) Integration vs segmentation in the Korean stock market, J. Busin. Financ. Account. 20, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and French, K. R. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns, J. Finance 47, 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and MacBeth, J. (1973) Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests, J. Polit. Economy 81, 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Stock Exchange, Fact Book, 1992.

  • Lo, A. and MacKinlay, A. C. (1990) Data-snooping biases in tests of financial asset pricing models, Rev. Financ. Stud. 3, 431–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji, S., Dhatt, M. S., and Kim, Y. H. (1997) A fundamental analysis of Korean stock returns, Financ. Analysts J. 53, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1995) An empirical survey of Indonesian equities, 1985–1992, Pacific-Basin Finance J. 3, 159–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhatt, M.S., Kim, Y.H. & Mukherji, S. Relations Between Stock Returns and Fundamental Variables: Evidence from a Segmented Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 6, 221–233 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010071921399

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010071921399

Navigation