Skip to main content
Log in

Cellulase production by Rhizobium

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The production of cellulase byRhizobium species was studied.Rhizobium trifolii cellulase was induced by a variety of polysaccharides, including celluloses and hemicelluloses. Cellobiose and myo-inositol also allowed enzyme expression but mannitol prevented it at concentrations higher than 0.25%. Both soluble and insoluble plant root substances moderately stimulated cellulase production byRhizobium trifolii.

Most substances tested did not induce the production of cellulases by the “slow-growing, cowpea type” rhizobia strain CIAT 79. Effective inducers were carboxymethylcellulose, gluconate and myo-inositol.

Cellulase production was very low under all conditions tested. In most cases the enzyme activity was loosely bound to the capsular material. The enzyme in fast-growers is an 1,4-β-D-glucan-4-glucanohydrolase (endo-glucanase EC 3.2.1.4) with specificity for high molecular weight polysaccharides.

There was no correlation between infectiveness ofRhizobium trifolii strains and cellulase production. One strain, which lacks the nodulation plasmid, produced cellulase at the same rate as its parental infective strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Bergersen F J 1961 The growth of Rhizobium in synthetic media. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 14, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callham D A and Torrey J G 1981 The structural basis for infection of root hairs ofTrifolium repens by Rhizobium Can. J. Bot. 59, 1647–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandler M R 1978 Some observations of infection ofArachis hypogea L. by Rhizobium. J. Exp. Bot. 29, 749–755.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodge J E and Hofreiter B T 1962 Determination of reducing sugars and carbohydrates. p. 380–394In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Eds. R L Whistler and M L Wolfrom. Vol 1 Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hooykaas P J J, van Brussel A A N, den Dulk-Ras H, van Slogteren G M S and Schilperoort R A 1981 Sym plasmid ofRhizobium trifolii expressed in different rhizobial species andAgrobacterium tumerfaciens. Nature London 291, 351–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubbell D H, Morales V M and Umali-Garcia M 1978 Pectolytic enzymes inRhizobium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32, 210–213.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li D and Hubbell D H 1969 Infection thread formation as a basis of nodulation specificity in Rhizobium-strawberry clover associations. Can. J. Microbiol. 15, 1135–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lillich T T and Elkan G H 1968 Evidence countering the role of polygalacturonase in invasion of root hairs of leguminous plants byRhizobium spp. Can. J. Microbiol. 14, 617–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ljunggren H and Gahraeus G 1961 The role of polygalacturonase in root-hair invasion by nodule bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 26, 521–528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A and Randall R J 1951 Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macmillan J D and Cooke R C 1969 Evidence against involvement of pectic enzymes in the invasion of root hairs byRhizobium trifolii. Can. J. Microbiol. 15, 643–645.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Molina E, Morales V M and Hubbell D H 1969 Hydrolytic enzyme production by Rhizobium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38, 1186–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Napoli C A and Hubbell D H 1975 Ultrastructure of Rhizobium-induced infection threads in clover root hairs. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 1003–1009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nutman P S 1956 The influence of the legume in root nodule symbiosis: A comparative study of host determinants and functions. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 109–151.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olivares J, Montoya E and Palomares A 1977 Some effects derived from the presence of extrachromosomal DNA inRhizobium meliloti. p. 375–385.In Recent Developments in Nitrogen Fixation. Eds. W Newton, J R Postgate and C Rodriguez-Barrueco. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palomares A J 1975 Production de poligalacturonasas en la association Rhizobium-leguminosa. Ph. D. Thesis, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain, 153 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solheim B and Raa J 1971 Evidence countering the theory of specific induction of pectindegrading enzymes as the basis for specificity in Rhizobium leguminous associations. Plant and Soil 35, 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Somogyi M 1952 Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Verma D P S and Zogbi V 1978 A cooperative action of plant and Rhizobium to dissolve the host cell wall during development of root nodule symbiosis. Plant Sci. Letters 13, 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincent J M 1970 A Manual for the Practical Study of Root Nodule Bacteria. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zurkowski W and Lorkiewicz Z 1979 Plasmid-mddiated control of nodulation inRhizobium trifolii. Arch. Microbiol. 123, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morales, V.M., Martinez-Molina, E. & Hubbell, D.H. Cellulase production by Rhizobium. Plant Soil 80, 407–415 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140047

Key words

Navigation