Skip to main content
Log in

Host plant growth response to inoculation withFrankia

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimum growth conditions and inoculation regimes were determined for severalFrankia strains isolated from both Alnus and Casuarina host plants. Growth conditions were estabilished that allowed a reduction in generation time to less than 15 hours for certain Alnus derivedFrankia. Differences in plant growth response were observed with differing inoculum levels and soil mixtures. Elite strains of Alnus derivedFrankia were isolated that elicited similar growth reponses in allAlnus species tested; however, differences were observed betweenFrankia strains and plant growth response of variousCasuarina species tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson D R, Mazzucco C E and Browning T J 1985 Physiological aspects ofFrankia. In Nitrogen Fixation and CO2 Metabolism. Eds. P W Ludden and J E Burris. pp 175–182. Elsevier Science Publishing,

  • Bradford M M 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burggraaf A J P and Shipton W A 1982 Estimates ofFrankia growth under various pH and temperature regimes. Plant and Soil 69, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey C B and Wollum A G II 1984 Nitrogen fixation systems in forest plantations.In Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Eds. G D Bowen and E K S Nambiar. pp 361–377. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm E 1980 Firewood Crops. pp 1–9. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1950 The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. Calif. Agr. Exp. Stat. Circ. 347, Berkeley, CA.

  • Lalonde M, Calvert H E and Pine S 1982 Isolation and use ofFrankia strains in actinorhizal formation.In Current Perspectives in Nitrogen Fixation. Eds. A H Gibson and W E Newton, pp 296–299. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murry M A, Fontaine M S and Torrey J G 1984 Growth kinetics and nitrogenase induction inFrankia sp. HFP ArI3 grown in batch culture. Plant and Soil 78, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N 1980 Conversion of Tropical Moist Forests. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosbrook P A and Bowen G D 1987 The abilities of threeFrankia isolates to nodulate and fix nitrogen with four species ofCasuarina. Physiol. Plant. 70, 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowers M D 1987 Collection, isolation, cultivation and maintenance ofFrankia.In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation Technology. Ed. G H Elkan. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowers M D, Kulkarni R K and Steele D B 1986 Intermediary carbon metabolism inFrankia. Arch. Microbiol. 143, 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowers M D and Smith J E 1985 Inoculation and production container-grown red alder seedlings. Plant and Soil 87, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernie Steele, D., Ramirez, K. & Stowers, M.D. Host plant growth response to inoculation withFrankia . Plant Soil 118, 139–143 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232799

Key words

Navigation