Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of kriging estimation for square, triangular, and hexagonal grids

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although several researchers have pointed out some advantages and disadvantages of various soil sampling designs in the presence of spatial autocorrelation, a more detailed study is presented herein which examines the geometrical relationship of three sampling designs, namely the square, the equilateral triangle, and the regular hexagon. Both advantages and disadvantages exist in the use of these designs with respect to estimation of the semivariogram and their effect on the mean square error or variance of error. This research could be used to design optimal sampling strategies; it is based on the theory of regionalized variables, in which the intrinsic hypothesis is satisfied. Among alternative designs, an equilateral triangle design gives the most reliable estimate of the semivariogram. It also gives the minimum maximum mean square error of point estimation of the concentration over the other two designs for the same number of measurements when the nugget effect is small relative to the variance. If the nugget effect is large (.90 σ2 or more), and the linear sampling density is >0.85r where r is the range, the hexagonal design is best. This study computes and compares the maximum mean square error for each of these designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borgman, L. E., 1973, Spectrum Analysis of Random Data: University of Wyoming Press, Laramie, Wyoming, p. 1–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. and Jenkins, G. M., 1976, Time Series Analysis: Holden Day, San Francisco, California, p. 1–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M., 1977, Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 1–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, John C., 1973, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology: John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 298–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, G. T., 1978, Mining Geostatistics: Academic Press, London, p. 1–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A. B., Webster, R., and Burgess, T. M., 1981, The Design of Optimal Sampling Schemes for Local Estimation and Mapping of Regionalized Variables-I: Comput. Geosci., v. 7, n. 4, p. 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R. A., 1975, Optimum Mapping Techniques Using Regionalized Variable Theory: Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, p. 1–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R. A., 1984, Systematic Sampling of Spatial Functions: Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, Series on Spatial Analysis No. 7, p. 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yfantis, E.A., Flatman, G.T. & Behar, J.V. Efficiency of kriging estimation for square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. Math Geol 19, 183–205 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897746

Key words

Navigation