Abstract
The primary objective of an agriculture water management system is to provide crop needs to sustain high yields. Another objective of equal or greater importance in some regions is to reduce agriculture impacts on surface and groundwater quality. Kandil et al. (1992) modified the water management model DRAINMOD to predict soil salinity as affected by irrigation water quality and drainage system design. The objectives of this study are to incorporate an algorithm to quantify the effects of stresses due to soil salinity on crop yields and to demonstrate the applications of the model. DRAINMOD-S, is capable of predicting the long-term effects of different irrigation and drainage practices on crop yields. The overall crop function in the model includes the effects of stresses caused by excessive soil water conditions (waterlogging), soil water-deficits, salinity, and planting delays. Three irrigation strategies and six drain spacings were considered for all crops. In the first irrigation strategy, the irrigation amounts were equal to evapotranspiration requirements by the crops, with the addition of a 10 cm depth of water for leaching applied during each growing season. In the second strategy, the leaching depth (10 cm) was applied before the growing season. In the third strategy, a leaching depth of 15 cm was applied before the growing season for each crop. Another strategy (4th) with more leaching was considered for bean which is the crop most sensitive to salinity. In the fourth strategy, 14 days intervals were used instead of 7 and leaching irrigations were applied: 15 cm before the growing season and 10 cm at the middle of the growing season for bean. The objective function for these simulations was crop yield. Soil water conditions and soil salinity were continuously simulated for a crop rotation of bean, cotton, maize, soybean, and wheat over a 19 years period. Yields of individual crops were predicted for each growing season. Results showed that the third irrigation strategy resulted in the highest yields for cotton, maize, soybean and wheat. Highest yields for bean were obtained by the fourth irrigation strategy. Results are also presented on the effects of drain depth and spacing on yields. DRAINMOD-S is written in Fortran and requires a PC with math-coprocessor. It was concluded that DRAINMOD-S is a useful tool for design and evaluation of irrigation and drainage systems in irrigated arid lands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Evans, R.O., Skaggs, R.W. & Sneed, R.E. 1991. Stress day index models to predict corn and soybean relative yield under high water table conditions.Transactions of the ASAE 34(5): 1997–2005.
Hiler, E.A. 1969. Quantitative evaluation of crop-drainage requirements.Transactions of the ASAE 12(4): 499–505.
Kandil, H.M., Skaggs, R.W., Abdel Dayem, S., Aiad, Y. & Gilliam, J.W. 1992. DRAINMOD-S: Water management model for irrigated arid lands. 1. Theories, and Tests, presented at the ASAE international winter meeting, 1992. Paper No. 922566.
Shaw, R.H. 1978. Calculation of soil moisture and stress conditions in 1976, 1977. Iowa StateJournal of Research 53(2): 120–127.
Maas, E.V. & Hoffman, G.J. 1977. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE 104(IR2): 115–134.
Seymour, R.M., Skaggs, R.W. & Evans, R.O. 1992. Predicting corn yields response to planting date delay.Transactions of the ASAE 35(3): 865–870.
Skaggs, R.W. 1978. A water management model for shallow water table soils. Report No. 134. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina, N.C. State University, Raleigh.
Skaggs, R.W., Hardjoamidjojo, S., Wiser, E.H. & Hiler, E.A. 1982. Simulation of Crop Response to Surfce and Subsurface Drainage Systems.Transactions of the ASAE 25(6): 1673–1678.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kandil, H.M., Skaggs, R.W., Abdel Dayem, S. et al. DRAINMOD-S: Water management model for irrigated arid lands, crop yield and applications. Irrig Drainage Syst 9, 239–258 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880866
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880866