Conclusions
The calculation of the spin-orbit and the Casimir contributions are in progress, from our preliminary results we have observed the Casimir effect to be at least as large if not larger than the spin-orbit effect. This corresponds well with the atomic situation6,7. The calculation itself requires very careful analysis involving the summations over\(\mathop k\limits^ \to \), the symmetry12, and the use of the excited states, in order to arrive at definite conclusions regarding the relative importance of the three mechanisms carried over from the atom and any additional mechanisms that may be characteristic only for solid-state. It is hoped that conclusions drawn from our calculations on pure iron will be useful in applying these mechanisms to more complicated systems such as heavy atom alloys.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. J. Spijkerman, J. C. Travis, C. E. Pipkorn and C. E. Violet, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 323 (1971).
D. Salomon and D. A. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B9, 29 (1974).
P. Callaghan and N. J. Stone, see ref. 17 of ref. 5.
P. D. Johnston and N. J. Stone, J. Phys. C5, 1303 (1972).
G. A. Gehring, Physica Scripta11, 215 (1974).
L. Evans, P. G. H. Sandars and G. K. Woodgate, Proc. Roy. Soc. A289, 114 (1965).
K. Raghunathan, J. Andriessen, S. N. Ray and T. P. Das, Abstract 1.2 at this conference and Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.22, 343 (1977). [San Diego Meeting of American Physical Society, March 1977.]
K. J. Duff and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev. B3, 192 (1971).
K. J. Duff and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev. B3, 2294 (1971); B12, 3870 (1975).
J. Andriessen and D. Van Ormondt, J. Phys. B8, 1993–1998 (1975).
S. Ray, J. D. Lyons and T. P. Das, Phys. Rev.174, 104–118 (1968).
L. Falicov and J. Ruvalds, Phys. Rev.172, 498–507 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krawchuk, B.D., Ray, S.N., Das, T.P. et al. Mechanisms for electric field gradients in ferromagnetic cubic metals. Hyperfine Interact 4, 352–356 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01021850
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01021850