Skip to main content
Log in

Applications of the Dirichlet distribution to forensic match probabilities

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dirichlet distribution provides a convenient conjugate prior for Bayesian analyses involving multinomial proportions. In particular, allele frequency estimation can be carried out with a Dirichlet prior. If data from several distinct populations are available, then the parameters characterizing the Dirichlet prior can be estimated by maximum likelihood and then used for allele frequency estimation in each of the separate populations. This empirical Bayes procedure tends to moderate extreme multinomial estimates based on sample proportions. The Dirichlet distribution can also be employed to model the contributions from different ancestral populations in computing forensic match probabilities. If the ancestral populations are in genetic equilibrium, then the product rule for computing match probabilities is valid conditional on the ancestral contributions to a typical person of the reference population. This fact facilitates computation of match probabilities and tight upper bounds to match probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, J.H. & U. Dieter, 1974. Computer methods for sampling from gamma, beta, Poisson and binomial distributions. Computing 12:223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, J.M., 1976. Algorithm AS 103: psi (digamma) function. Appl. Stat. 25:315–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R. & K.K. Kidd, 1991. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254:1735–1739.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R., M.R. Srinivasan & S.P. Daiger, 1993. Evaluation of standard error and confidence interval of estimated multilocus genotype probabilities, and their applications in DNA forensics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:60–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, R.C.H. & G.M. Feast, 1979. Some simple gamma variate generators. Appl. Stat. 28:290–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, B., N. Risch & K. Roeder, 1992. Forensic inference from DNA fingerprints. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87:337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A., H.A. Hammond, L. Jin, C.T. Caskey & R. Chakraborty, 1992. Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics 12:241–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evett, I.W., 1992. Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is ‘It was my brother’. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 32:5–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J., 1965. The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille, E., 1959. Analytic Function Theory Vol. 1. Blaisdell Ginn, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A.J., V. Wilson & S.L. Thein, 1985. Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature 316:76–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, J.F.C., 1993. Poisson Processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E., 1989. DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature 339:501–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K., 1991. Comment on ‘Inferences using DNA profiling in forensic identification and paternity cases’ by D.A. Berry. Stat. Science 6:190–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K., 1993. Match probabilities in racially admixed populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:305–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.M., 1989. Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R., 1989. DNA typing on the witness stand. Science 244:1033–1035.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. & D.L. Hartl, 1991. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science 254:1745–1750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, M.R., J. Tiwari, J. Bond, D. Gjertson & P.I. Tersaki, 1983. Paternity probability calculations for mixed races. pp. 325–347 in Inclusion Probabilities in Parentage Testing, edited by R.H. Walker, Amer. Assoc. Blood Banks, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.S., 1987. Some Electic Matrix Theory. Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosimann, J.E., 1962. On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate β-distribution, and correlations among proportions. Biometrika 49:65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B.E., 1978. Algorithm AS 121: trigamma function. Appl. Stat. 27:97–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editor's comments

The author continues the formal Bayesian analysis introduced by Gjertson & Morris in this voluem. He invokes Dirichlet distributions, and so brings rigor to the discussion of the effects of population structure on match probabilities. The increased computational burden this approach entails should not be regarded as a hindrance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, K. Applications of the Dirichlet distribution to forensic match probabilities. Genetica 96, 107–117 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441156

Key words

Navigation