Skip to main content
Log in

The relation between wheat lines derived from the F2, F3, F4 and F5 generations for grain yield and harvest index

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relationships between the F2, F3, F4 and F5 generations for grain yield were determined using random, pedigreed lines derived from each generation. The lines from two crosses were grown in plots at two sites over two years. In the first year, only F2 and F3 derived lines were available, but in the second year the F2 to F5 were grown.

Correlations between lines in one generation and the mean of lines derived from them in a following generation increased as the generations were advanced. Correlations between consecutive generations were higher than those between generations two or three apart. Correlations between F2 and F5 derived lines, which indicate the effectiveness of selecting F2 lines, varied from 0.10 ns to o.49** when lines from both generations were grown in the same environment. Correlations between years of lines from the same or different generations were low and often non-significant.

Harvest index was measured on the F2 and F3 derived lines at the one site in the first year. Selection for improvement of grain yield using harvest index was no more effective than selection for yield directly, when considered across years.

It is conclued that, while gains in yield can be achieved by selecting for yield in early generations, a foremost consideration needs to be the influence of different sites and years on the effectiveness of selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briggs, K. G. & L. H. Shebeski, 1971. Early generation selection for yield and breadmaking quality of hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) Euphytica 20: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePauw, R. M. & L. H. Shebeski, 1973. An evaluation of an early generation yield testing procedure in Triticum aestivum. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53: 465–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C. M. & J. Hamblin, 1976. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy 28: 361–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. A. & Z. Kertesz, 1976. Harvest index in spaced populations and grain weight in microplots as indicators of yielding ability in spring wheat. Crop Science 16: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J., 1954. The use of F2 lines in predicting the performance of F3 selections in two barley crosses. Agronomy Journal 46: 541–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, D. R. & J. Kumar, 1975. Comparison of early generation yield testing and a single seed descent procedure in wheat breeding. Crop Science 15: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. I. H. & J. W. Lambert, 1961. A comparison of F3 lines and their related F6 lines in two barley crosses. Crop Science 1: 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebeski, L. H., 1967. In: K. F. Neilson (Ed.), Wheat and breeding. Proceedings of the Canadian Centennial Wheat Symposium. p. 253. Modern Press, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, J. R., 1972. Single-plant characters as a measure of field plot performance of wheat cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 753–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whan, B. R., 1978. Selection for yield and other characters in wheat. Ph. D. thesis, University of Adelaide.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whan, B.R., Rathjen, A.J. & Knight, R. The relation between wheat lines derived from the F2, F3, F4 and F5 generations for grain yield and harvest index. Euphytica 30, 419–430 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034006

Index words

Navigation