Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J.R.Language, Memory, and Thought. New York: Wiley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D.G. and T. Winograd. “An Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language,”Cognitive Science 1(1978).

  • Boden, M.Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York: Basic Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charniak, E. “A Framed PAINTING: The Representation of a Commonsense Knowledge Fragment,”Cognitive Science 1(1977).

  • Chomsky, N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L.What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. “Scenes-and-Frames Semantics,” in Zampolli, A. ed.,Linguistic Structures Processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D.J. and D.T. Hakes.Psycholinguistics: An Introduction to the Psychology of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaniklidis, C.Compatibility, Complexity, and Language. New York: Haven Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.J.Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.J.Propositional Structures and Illocutionary Force. New York: Crowell, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.J. and J.A. Fodor. “The Structure of a Semantic Theory,”Language 39(1963).

  • Kintsch, W. and T.A. van Dijk. “Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production,”Psychological Review 85(1978).

  • Lehnert, W.G.The Process of Question Answering: A Computer Simulation of Cognition. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellema, P. “A Brief Against Case Grammar,”Foundations of Language 2(1974).

  • Organick, E.I., A.I. Forsythe, and R.P. Plummer.Programming Language Structures. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbeck, C.K. and R.C. Schank. “Comprehension by Computer: Expectation-based Analysis of Sentences in Context,” in Levelt, W.J.M. and G.B. Flores d'Arcais, eds.,Studies in the Perception of Language. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. and R. Abelson.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, S. “Actions, Motives, and Feelings,” in Weir, S., M.R. Adler, and M. McLennan,Final Report On Action Perception Project. Edinburgh: Artificial Intelligence Department, University of Edinburgh, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. “A Framework for Understanding Discourse,” in Just, M.A. and P.A. Carpenter, eds.,Cognitive Processes in comprehension. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P.H.Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • William H. Flanigan and Nancy H. Zingale, “The Measurement of Electoral Change,”Political Methodology (Summer, 1974), 49–82.

  • Chomsky, N. 1965.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresher, B.E. and N. Hornstein. 1976. “On Some Supposed Contributions of Artificial Intelligence to the Scientific Study of Language,”Cognition 4, 321–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresher, B.E. and N. Hornstein. 1977a. “Reply to Schank and Wilensky.”Cognition 5, 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresher, B.E. and N. Hornstein. 1977b. “Reply to Winograd.”Cognition 5, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1967a. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Part 1.”Journal of Linguistics 3, 37–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1967b. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Part 2.”Journal of Linguistics 3, 199–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1968. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme. Part 3.”Journal of Linguistics 4, 179–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. 1962.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, W.K. 1976. “The Applicability of Kuhn's Paradigms to the History of Linguistics.”Language 52, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C. and R. Wilensky. 1977. “Response to Dresher and Hornstein.”Cognition 5, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. 1972. “Understanding Natural Language.”Cognitive Psychology 3, 1–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. 1977. “On Some Contested Suppositions of Generative Linguistics About the Scientific Study of Language.”Cognition 5, 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M.F. and D.A. Lury, “A Statistics Workbook for Social Science Students” Philip Alan, 1977.

  • Loether, H.J. and D. McTavish,Descriptive and Inferential Statistics, Allyn and Bacon, 1976.

  • Rowe, B.C. and J.F. Hall, “Computer Software for Survey Analysis,”Computer Weekly, September 28, 1978.

  • Rowe, B.C. and M. Scheer,Computer Software for Social Science Data, London: Social Science Research Council, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonquist, J. and P. Dunkelberg,Survey and Opinion Research, Prentice-Hall, 1977.

  • Utting, J. and J.F. Hall, “The Use of Computers in University of Social Science Departments,” London: Social Science Research Council, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Leslie Mezei, an independent writer, was until recently, an academic, teaching computer science and doing research in computer graphics and on the social implications of computer use.

former director of the TAUM machine translation project.

Albert C.E. Parker, who received his Ph.D. from Washington University, St. Louis, lives in Alexandria, Virginia.

conducting research on the impact of automation on academic libraries.

editor of Computer Methods in the Analysis of Large Scale Social Systems (MIT Press, 1968).

interested in paleoecology and in statistical applications to anthropological research in general. An Old World prehistorian (Spain, France, Turkey), he is also the editor of the Anthropological Research Papers.

She has a B. Eng. (electronics), an M.S. in computer science and many years of programming and teaching experience in various languages.

his main interests are planning and management.

interested in computational linguistics and languages in contact.

Gerd Althoff ist in dem Historischen Seminar der Universität Freiburg.

Dr. John Rothman is the Director of Research and Information Technology of The New York Times Co. and the originator of The New York Times Information Bank. He holds a Ph.D. degree in English and Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Mimi Penchansky, an assistant professor, is head of the general reference department of the Paul Klapper Library of Queens College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaniklidis, C., Mezei, L., Kittredge, R. et al. Book reviews. Comput Hum 13, 311–333 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400144

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400144

Navigation