Skip to main content
Log in

Destructive mechanism for periclase-spinel and magnesite-chromite refractories in oxygen converter linings

  • Refractories in Service
  • Published:
Refractories Aims and scope

Conclusions

The greatest wear of magnesite-chrome and periclase-spinel linings was observed in the cylindrical part of the converter in the places showing intense movement of metal and slag and maximum heat load. In these sections of the structure we get a predominant erosion by fusion, but the share of the erosion due to scaling is substantial.

In the throat, wear of the lining occurs mainly due to scaling as a result of frequent changes in temperature and air.

The wear of the lining of the bottom is slight compared with sections located above and takes place mainly as a result of erosion developed during intensive movement of the metal in the blow period.

PS refractories are more resistant in the linings of the converter than MC refractories, which is explained by the difference in the mechanism of their wear.

To increase the resistance of refractories PS against the action of converter slags it is necessary to make them from enriched chromitic ores and magnesite with the use of high-temperature firing, which will ensure better development of the direct bond of the grains of periclase with the chrome-spinel and more complete mineral formation (with maximum yield of secondary spinel).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. E. V. Ivanov, et al., Collection of papers UNIIO, No. 5 (1961).

  2. G. N. Kozin, et al., Ogneupory No. 2, p. 71 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Kudrina, et al., Stal' No. 9, p. 400 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Golov, et al., Stal' No. 6 (1965).

  5. Refractories for Producting Steel Using Oxygen Symposium From English, Metallurgiya, [in Russian] (1965).

  6. G. V. Sokolov, Collections “Chromates USSR”, Vol.II, Acad., Sci., USSR, [in Russian] (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. M. Zubakov, Mineral Formation in Chrome-Magnesite Refractories, Acad. Sci. KazSSR (1960).

  8. L. J. Trostel, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 22, No. 2 (1939).

  9. A. S. Frenkel', et al., Collection of papers, UNIIO, No. 3, [in Russian] (1960).

  10. L. I. Karyakin and K. N. Repenko, Trans 5th Conference on Experimental and Industrial Mineralogy and Petrography, Acad. Sci. USSR, [in Russian] (1958).

  11. W. S. Treffner, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 45, No. 10 (1962).

  12. W. S. Treffner, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 44, No. 12 (1961).

  13. G. R. Rigby, Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 55, No. 1 (1956).

  14. A. D. Smiegelskas and E. O. Kirkendall, Trans. Amer. Inst. min. Eng.,171, 130 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Ogneupory, No. 1, pp.32–38, January, 1967.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonov, K.V., Perepelitsyn, V.A., Golov, G.V. et al. Destructive mechanism for periclase-spinel and magnesite-chromite refractories in oxygen converter linings. Refractories 8, 33–40 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01290208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01290208

Keywords

Navigation