Skip to main content
Log in

A form of government organization from the perspective of transaction cost economics

  • Articles
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking the approach of the superfirm, we characterize government organization through six different features. First, citizens are viewed as sovereign owners of a superfirm; elected officials are employees of the sovereign citizens. Second, in analogy to the economic principle of the division of labor and specialization, a division of labor between five independent branches of government is advocated: the legislative, the budgetary, the executive, the law enforcement, and the judiciary branch. Third, we do not suggest a mechanism of checks and balances between government branches but deal with the threat of tyranny using the principle of separation of decision control and decision management developed by Eugene Fama and Michael Jensen. Fourth, with election as a decision control device, we demarcate the constituency of the budgetary branch by age groups to provide an explicit control mechanism for intertemporal and intergenerational trades. Fifth, to strengthen sovereign citizens' decision control, the powers to recall elected chief public servants, to declare emergency and war, to sign into international treaties, and to amend the constitution are vested with a national assembly. Sixth, there is no head of state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breton, A. (1989) “The Growth of Competitive Governments.”Canadian Journal of Economics 22(4): 717–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1991) “The Organization of Competition in Congressional and Parliamentary Governments.” In: Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.)The Competitive State. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1977) “Toward a Tax Constitution for Leviathan.”Journal of Public Economics 8: 255–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962)The Calculus of Consent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1969)Cost and Choice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Wagner, R. E. (1977)Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. H., and Gordon, L. H. D. (1991)All Under Heaven: Sun Yat-sen and His Revolutionary Thought. Stanford: Hoover Institutional Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. N. S. (1983) “The Contractual Nature of Firm.”Journal of Law and Economics 26: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm.”Economica 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1988)The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1991)The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Volume edited by O. Williamson and S. Winter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Comes, R., and Sandler, T. (1986)The Theory of Extemalites, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domes, J. (1989) “China's Modernization and the Doctrine of Democracy.” In: Cheng, C.-Y. (ed.) Sun Yat-sen's Doctrine in the Modern World, 201–25. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, G. (1987) “The Function of Authority in Transaction Cost Economics.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8: 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957)An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edigi, M. (1992) “Organizational Learning, Problem Solving and the Division of Labor.” In: Edigi, M., and Moms, R. (eds.)Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica (1979) “Constitutions and Constitutional Law.” Vol. 5: 84. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. C. (1983) “Separation of Ownership and Control.”Journal of Law and Economics 16: 301–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, A. J., and Chang, M. H. (1989) “The Thoughts of Sun Yat-sen in Comparative Perspective.” In: Cheng, C.-Y. (ed.)Sun Yat-sen's Doctrine in the Modern World, 103–37. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1960)Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1973)Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1978) “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In:New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and History of Ideas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1979) “A Model Constitution.” Chap. 17 in Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1980a) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In:Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1980b) “The Meaning of Competition.” In:Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1980c) “The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism.” In:Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsü, L. S. (1933)Sun Yat-sen, His Political and Social Ideas: A Source Book. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, S. S. (1993) “Entrepreneurship, Transaction Costs, and Subjectivist Economics.”Journal of Enterprising Culture 1(2): 159–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, G.-K. (1989) “An Over View of Sun Yat-sen's Doctrine.” In: Cheng, C.-Y. (ed.)Sun Yat-sen's Doctrine in the Modern World, 52–78. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1992)The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, J. (1986) “Covert War and Congressional Authority: Hidden War & Forgotten Power.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review 134: 1035–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (1964) “The Separation of Powers: A Hedge against Tyranny?” Paper 48 in Hacker, A. (ed.)The Federalist Papers. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. G. (1992) “Economics of Direct Legislation.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(May): 541–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. ([1981])Principles of Economics. Trans. by J. Dingwall and B. F. Hoselitz. New York: New York University Press.

  • Pagano, U. (1991) “Property Rights, Asset Specificity, and the Division of Labor under Alternative Capitalist Relations.”Canadian Journal of Economics 15: 315–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976) “Another Advantage of Division of Labor.”Journal of Political Economy 84(4): Part 1, 861–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de ([1835] 1945)Democracy in America. Transl. by H. Reeve. Vintage Books.

  • Tullock, G. (1965) “Constitutional Mythology.”New Individualist Review September: 12–17.

  • Twight, C. (1988) “Government Manipulation of Constitutional-level Transaction Costs: A General Theory of Transaction Cost Augmentation and the Growth of Government.”Public Choice 56: 131–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1992) “Constitution as Governance Structures: The Political Foundation of Secure Markets.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149(1): 286–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R., and Marshall, W. J. (1988) “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.”Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1989) “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.”Journal of Political Economy 97(6): 1395–1424.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kan, S.S., Hwang, CS. A form of government organization from the perspective of transaction cost economics. Constit Polit Econ 7, 197–219 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128162

Jel classification

Navigation