Skip to main content
Log in

Optimality of a direct adaptive controller in the presence of model mismatch and bounded disturbances

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we consider an adaptive controller with vanishing gain and excitation of the reference signal. We use the burst recovery concept to show that all signals in the adaptive loop remain uniformly bounded. We also show that the mean-square performance converges so that the adaptive system is optimal in the sense that the parameter estimation error and the one-step ahead prediction error are uncorrelated in the mean despite the presence of the unmodeled dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Åstöm and B. Wittenmark, On self-tuning regulators,Automatica, vol. 9, pp. 185–199, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. C. Goodwin, P. J. Ramadge, and P. E. Caines, Discrete time stochastic adaptive control,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 19, pp. 829–853, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Guo and H. Chen, The Åström-Wittenmark self-tuning regulator revisited and ELS-based adaptive trackers,IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 36, pp. 802–812, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Ioannou and A. Datta, Robust adaptive control: A unified approach,Proc. IEEE, vol. 79, pp. 1736–1768, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. Ioannou and J. Sun, Theory and design of robust direct and indirect adaptive-control schemes,Internat. J. Control, vol. 47, pp. 775–813, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. R. Kumar, A survey of some results in stochastic adaptive control,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 23, pp. 329–380, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Praly, Robustness of model reference adaptive control, Proc. Second Yale Workshop on Adaptive Systems, New Haven, CT, 1983.

  8. L. Praly, S. F. Lin, and P. R. Kumar, A robust adaptive minimum variance controller,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 27, pp. 235–266, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. S. Radenkovic and A. N. Michel, Verification of the self-stabilization mechanism in robust stochastic adaptive control using Lyapunov function arguments,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1270–1294, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. S. Radenkovic and A. N. Michel, Robust adaptive systems and self stabilization,IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 37, pp. 1355–1369, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. S. Radenkovic and B. Ydstie, Using persistent excitation with fixed energy to stabilize adaptive controllers and obtain hard bounds for the parameter estimation error,SIAM J. Control Optim., submitted.

  12. B. E. Ydstie, Transient performance and robustness of direct adaptive control,IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 37, pp. 1091–1105, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radenkovic, M.S., Erik Ydstie, B. Optimality of a direct adaptive controller in the presence of model mismatch and bounded disturbances. Circuits Systems and Signal Process 18, 205–223 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225695

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225695

Keywords

Navigation