Abstract
By analysing numerous reports, from different locations, on the duration of totality of the solar eclipses on 24 January 1925, and on 26 February 1979, we have found that the solar radius at the earlier date was 0.5 arc s, or 375 km larger than at the later date. The correction to the standard solar radius found for each eclipse was different when different subsets of the observations were used (for example, edge of path of totality timings compared with central timings), suggesting the existence of systematic inaccuracies in our knowledge of the lunar figure. However, the differences between the corrections for both eclipses were very similar for all subsets considered, indicating that changes of the solar size may be reliably inferred despite the existence of the lunar figure errors, as long as the proper consideration is made of the distribution of the observations. We consider that these results are strong evidence in support of the occurrence of solar radius changes on shorter than evolutionary time scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Endal, A. S. & Sofia, S. Astrophys. J. 243, 625–640 (1981).
Sofia, S., O'Keefe, J., Lesh, J. R. & Endal, A. S. Science 204, 1306–1308 (1979).
Dunham, D. W., Sofia, S., Fiala, A. D., Herald, D. & Muller, P. M. Science 210, 1243–1245 (1980).
Gilliland, R. L. Astrophys. J. 248, 1144–1155 (1981).
Shapiro, I. I. Science 208, 51–53 (1980).
Parkinson, J. H., Morrison, L. V. & Stephenson, F. R. Nature 288, 548–551 (1980).
Sofia, S., Dunham, D. W. & Fiala, A. D. in Proc. Conf. Ancient Sun, 147 (Lunar and Planetary Science Institute, Houston, Texas 1980).
Russell, H. N. Scient. Am. January, 13 (1925).
Brown, E. W. Astr. J. 37, 9–19 (1926).
Magalhaes, F. V. et al.. Trans. Illumin. Engng Soc. 20, 565–628 (1925).
Seagrave, F. E. Popular Astr. 33, 279 (1925).
Herald, D. Moon 15, 91–107 (1976).
Watts, C. B. Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem. 17, (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sofia, S., Dunham, D., Dunham, J. et al. Solar radius change between 1925 and 1979. Nature 304, 522–526 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0
This article is cited by
-
Guidelines for measuring solar radius with Baily beads analysis
Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy (2009)
-
Solar Radius Determination from Total Solar Eclipse Observations on 29 March 2006
Solar Physics (2009)
-
The solar radius derived from limb-darkening scans obtained in 1981 and from 1986 to 1990
Solar Physics (1995)
-
Solar variability and climate
Climatic Change (1994)
-
Recent results on the solar diameter
Solar Physics (1991)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.