Abstract
IN 1954, Steward and Millar1 reported that the absorption of cæsium ions by carrot root tissue was inhibited by dinitrocresol, and that after tissues had been stimulated to rapid growth in the presence of coconut milk they were more sensitive to the inhibitor than were slowly growing cultures. Steward concluded that the rapidly growing tissues consisted mainly of meristematic cells while the slowly growing tissues comprised mainly vacuo-lated cells. On this assumption he explained the differing sensitivity to uncoupling agents of the tissue in its two conditions by the suggestion that salt absorption into the cytoplasm of plant cells is more dependent on oxida-tive phosphorylation than is the subsequent transfer of ions into vacuoles. The experimental data provided by Steward and Millar1 and by Millar2 in support of this important conclusion are, however, rather complicated and difficult to interpret. Furthermore, Arisz3 claimed that chloride absorption into the cytoplasm of Vallisneria leaf cells is less sensitive to dinitrophenol than is its accumulation into vacuoles. In view of these considerations, it seemed desirable to examine the situation further and we wish to report some observations on the sensitivity to dinitrophenol of potassium absorption in rapidly and slowly growing carrot tissue cultures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Steward, F. C., and Millar, F. K., Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 8, 367 (1954).
Millar, F. K., Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester (1953).
Arisz, W. H., Acta. bot. Néerl., 1, 506 (1953).
Caplin, S. M., and Steward, F. C., Ann. Bot., N.S., 16, 219 (1952).
Sutcliffe, J. F., and Counter, E. R., Nature, 183, 1513 (1959).
Caplin, S. M., Amer. J. Bot., 43, 749 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITHERS, A., SUTCLIFFE, J. Sensitivity to Dinitrophenol of Potassium Absorption in Carrot Root Tissue Cultures. Nature 204, 1330–1331 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2041330a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2041330a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.