Summary
The retention characteristics of 22 aniline derivatives were determined on a porous, graphitized-carbon column in unbuffered acetonitrile-water and methanol-water mixtures. Each aniline derivative gave symmetrical peaks in each eluent without buffers. Good linear correlations were found between the log k′ and the concentration of the organic component in the eluent. The slope and intercept values differed according to the type of organic modifier and the charcter, number and position of substituents, indicating the different selectivities of methanol and acetonitrile and the good separating power of the column. Multivariate mathematical-statistical calculations proved that the retention of ring-substituted aniline derivatives is mainly governed by electronic parameters and the hydrogen acceptor capacity of substituents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. T. Gilbert, J. H. Knox, B. Kaur, Chromatographia16, 138 (1982).
J. H. Knox, B. Kaur, G. R. Millward, J. Chromatogr.3, 352 (1986).
A. Berthod, J. Chromatogr.1, 549 (1991).
H. Tayar, H. Waterbend, B. Testa, J. Chromatogr.305, 320 (1985).
B. Kaur, LC-GC3, 41 (1990).
D. Berek, J. Novak, Chromatographia30, 582 (1990).
J. C. Berridge, J. Chromatogr.449, 317 (1988).
R. Kaliszan, K. Osmialowski, J. Chromatogr.333, 499 (1990).
H. Hager, Moderne Regressionsanalyse, Salle Sauerlander, Frankfurt am Main 1982.
K. V. Mardia, J. T. Kent, J. M. Bibby, Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, London and New York, 1979.
R. Franke, QSAR and Strategies in the Design of Bioactive Compounds, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim 1985.
T. Cserháti, Z. Illés, Chromatographia31, 152 (1991).
J. W. Sammon, Jr., IEEE Transactions on Computers C18, 401 (1969).
S. M. Free, J. W. Wilson, J. Med. Chem.7, 395 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forgács, E., Cserháti, T. Retention of some ring-substituted aniline derivatives by porous graphitized carbon. Dependence on physico-chemical parameters. Chromatographia 33, 356–360 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275918
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275918