Abstract
A previous study (Bull. Math. Biophysics,31, 417–427, 1969) on the definitions of stability of equilibria in organismic sets determined byQ relations is continued. An attempt is made to bring this definition into a form as similar as possible to that used in physical systems determined byF-relations. With examples taken from physics, biology and sociology, it is shown that a definition of equilibria forQ-relational systems similar to the definitions used in physics can be obtained, provided the concept of stable or unstable structures of a system determined byQ-relations is considered in a probabilistic manner. This offers an illustration of “fuzzy categories,” a notion introduced by I. Bąianu and M. Marinescu (Bull. Math. Biophysics,30, 625–635, 1968), in their paper on organismic supercategories, which is designed to provide a mathematical formalism for Rashevsky's theory of Organismic Sets (Bull. Math. Biophysics,29, 389–393, 1967;30, 163–174, 1968;31, 159–198, 1969). A suggestion is made for a method of mapping the abstract discrete space ofQ-relations on a continuum of variables ofF-relations. Problems of polymorphism and metamorphosis, both in biological and social organisms, are discussed in the light of the theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Baianu, I. and M. Marinescu. 1968. “Organismic Supercategories: I. Proposals for a General Unitary Theory of Systems.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,30, 625–635.
Jacob, F. and J. Monod. 1961. “On the Regulation of Gene Activity.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 193–209.
Kauzman, W. 1957.Quantum Chemistry. New York: Academic Press.
Lwoff, A. 1962.Biological Order. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Martinez, H. 1964. “Toward an Optimal Design Principle in Relational Biology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,26, 351–365.
Monod, J. and F. Jacobs, 1961. “General Conclusions, Teleonomic Mechanisms in Cellular Metabolism.”Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology,26, 289–400.
Prosser, C. L. and F. A. Brown, Jr. 1961.Comparative Animal Physiology. pp. 560–561. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, Co.
Rashevsky, N. 1955. “Some Remarks on Topological Biology.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,17, 207–218.
— 1960.Mathematical Biophysics. The Physico-Mathematical Foundations of Biology. Third and Revised Edition. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
— 1965. “The Representation of Organisms in Terms of Predicates.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,27, 477–491.
— 1966. “Physics, Biology, and Sociology: A Reappraisal.” —Ibid.,28, 283–308.
Rashevsky, N. 1967a. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,29, 139–152.
— 1967b. “Organismic Sets and Biological Epimorphism.” —Ibid.,29, 389–393.
— 1967c. “Physics, Biology and Sociology: II. Suggestion for a Synthesis.” —Ibid.,29, 643–648.
— 1968. “Organismic Sets: II. Some General Considerations.” —Ibid.,30, 163–174.
— 1969a. “Outline of a Unified Approach to Physics, Biology and Sociology.” —Ibid.,31, 159–198.
— 1969b. “Multiple Relational Equilibria: Polymorphism, Metamorphosis and Other Possible Similar Phenomena.” —Ibid.,31, 417–427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rashevsky, N. Some considerations on relational equilibria. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 31, 605–617 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476641
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476641