Skip to main content
Log in

Hydropower, adaptive management, and Biodiversity

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptive management is a policy framework within which an iterative process of decision making is followed based on the observed responses to and effectiveness of previous decisions. The use of adaptive management allows science-based research and monitoring of natural resource and ecological community responses, in conjunction with societal values and goals, to guide decisions concerning man's activities. The adaptive management process has been proposed for application to hydropower operations at Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River, a situation that requires complex balancing of natural resources requirements and competing human uses. This example is representative of the general increase in public interest in the operation of hydropower facilities and possible effects on downstream natural resources and of the growing conflicts between uses and users of river-based resources. This paper describes the adaptive management process, using the Glen Canyon Dam example, and discusses ways to make the process work effectively in managing downstream natural resources and biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Carothers, W., and B. T. Brown. 1991. The Colorado River through Grand Canyon: Natural history and human change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, S. W., and D. Wegner. No date. Adaptive management at Glen Canyon Dam and in the Grand Canyon: A management opportunity. Unpublished draft.

  • DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). No date. Glen Canyon environmental studies, Phase II. Washington, DC, unpublished.

  • DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). 1988. Glen Canyon environmental studies final report [phase I]. Washington, DC, 84 pp.

  • DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). 1995. Operation of Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River storage project, Arizona, final environmental impact statement. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 337 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N., and J. Lawrence. 1986. Restoration under the Northwest Power Act; Adaptive management: Learning from the Columbia River Basin fish and wildlife program.Environmental Law 16:429–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1991a. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology and public policy. Washington, DC.

  • NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1991b. Colorado River ecology and dam management. Washington, DC, 276 pp.

  • Sparks, R. E. 1995. Need for ecological management of large river-floodplain ecosystems.BioScience 46:168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, A. M. 1959. Ecological studies of flora and fauna in Glen Canyon. Glen Canyon series 7, Report no. 40. Department of Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieringa, M.J., Morton, A.G. Hydropower, adaptive management, and Biodiversity. Environmental Management 20, 831–840 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205963

Key words

Navigation