Abstract
In group technology, workpieces are categorised into families according to their similarity in design or manufacturing attributes. This categorisation can eliminate design duplication and facilitate the production of workpieces. Much effort has been focused on the development of automated workpiece classification systems. However, it is difficult to evaluate the utility of such systems. The objective of this study was to develop a benchmark classification system based on global shape information for use in evaluating the utility of workpiece classification systems. A classification system has a high level of utility if its classification scheme is consistent with users' perceptual judgment of the similarity between workpiece shapes. Hence, in the proposed method, the consistency between a classification system and users' perceptual judgements is used as an index of the utility of the system. The proposed benchmark classification has two salient characteristics:
-
1.
It is user-oriented, because it is based on users' judgments concerning the similarity of the global shape of workpieces.
-
2.
It is flexible, allowing users to adjust the criteria of similarity applied in the automated workpiece classification.
The development of this classification consisted of three steps:
-
1.
Gathering row data on global shape similarity from a group of representative users and modelling the data by fuzzy numbers.
-
2.
Developing benchmark classification for various similarity criteria by using fuzzy clustering analysis.
-
3.
Developing indices for evaluating the appropriate number of workpiece categories and homogeneity within each group.
The applicability of the benchmark classification system in evaluating the utility of automated workpiece classification systems was examined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Bhadra and G. W. Fischer, “A new GT classification approach: a data base with graphical dimensions”,Manufacturing Review 11, pp. 44–49, 1988.
C. S. Chen, “A form feature oriented coding scheme”,Computers and Industrial Engineering 17, pp. 227–233, 1989.
M. R. Henderson and S. Musti, “Automated group technology part coding from a three-dimensional CAD data-base”,Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 110, pp. 278–287, 1988.
S. Kaparthi and N. Suresh, “A neural network system for shape-based classification and coding of rotational parts”,International Journal of Production Research 29, pp. 1771–1784, 1991.
S. R. Jen, “A neural network approach to the classification of 3D prismatic parts”, Master Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 1995.
T. Lenau and L. Mu, “Features in integrated modeling of products and their production”,International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 6(1&2), pp. 65–73, 1993.
M. C. Wu, J. R. Chen and S. R. Jen, “Global shape information modeling and classification of 2D workpieces”,International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 7(5), pp. 216–275, 1994.
M. C. Wu and S. R. Jen, “A neural network approach to the classification of 3D prismatic parts”,International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 11, pp. 325–335, 1996.
L. A. Cooper, “Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition”,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16, pp. 1097–1106, 1990.
R. Arnheim,The Power of Center, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.
S. J. Chen and C. L. Hwang,Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making — Method and Application, A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer, New York, 1992.
J. J. Buckley, “The multiple judge, multiple criteria ranking problem: a fuzzy set approach”,Fuzzy Sets and Systems 13, pp. 25–37, 1984.
S. Murakami, H. Maeda and S. Imamura, “Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control system”, Preprints IFAC Conference onFuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, pp. 353–358, 1983.
F. Bouslama and A. Ichikawa, “Fuzzy control rules and their natural control laws”,Fuzzy Sets and Systems 48, pp. 65–86, 1992.
S. K. Tan, H. H. Teh and P. Z. Wang, “Sequential representation of fuzzy similarity relations”,Fuzzy Sets and Systems 67, pp. 181–189, 1994.
G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger,Fuzzy Set, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice-Hall, 1992.
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets”,Information and Control 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.
H. J. Zimmermann,Fuzzy Set Theory: and Its Application, 2nd edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
R. Jan, “Decision-making in the presence of fuzzy variables”,IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics,6, pp 698–703, 1976.
D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Operations on fuzzy numbers”,International Journal of System Sciences 9, pp 613–626, 1978.
A. Kaufmann and M. M. Gupta,Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985.
L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning”, Part 1, 2 and 3,Information Science 8, pp. 199–249, 301–357, 1975;9, pp. 43–58, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, S.H., Hsia, T.C. & Wu, M.C. A flexible classification method for evaluating the utility of automated workpiece classification system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13, 637–648 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350822
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350822