Abstract
In this paper we re-examine some of the available methods for pricing out the columns in the simplex method and point out their potential advantages and disadvantages. In particular, we show that a simple formula for updating the pricing vector can be used with some advantage in the standard product form simplex algorithm and with very considerable advantage in two recent developments: P.M.J. Harris' dynamic scaling method and the Forrest—Tomlin method for maintaining triangular factors of the basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.M.L. Beale,Mathematical programming in practice (Pitmans, London, 1968).
J. de Buchet, “How to take into account the low density of matrices to design a mathematical programming package”, in:Large sparse sets of linear equations Ed. J.K. Reid (Academic Press, London, 1971) pp. 211–217.
G.B. Dantzig,Linear programming and extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1963).
J.J.H. Forrest and J.A. Tomlin, “Updating triangular factors of the basis to maintain sparsity in the product form simplex method”Mathematical Programming 2 (1972) 263–278.
P.M.J. Harris, “Pivot selection methods of the devex LP code”,Mathematical Programming 5 (1973) 1–28.
W. Orchard—Hays,Advanced linear programming computing techniques (McGraw—Hill, New York, 1968).
G. Zoutendijk,Methods of feasible directions (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research and reproduction of this report was partially supported by the Office of Naval Research under contract N-00014-67-A-0112-0011; U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Contract AT(04-3)-326-PA #18; and National Science Foundation Grant GJ 30408X.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomlin, J.A. On pricing and backward transformation in linear programming. Mathematical Programming 6, 42–47 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580221
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580221