Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The roles ofDrosophila ocelli and compound eyes in phototaxis

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Drosophila have three types of photoreceptors in their compound eyes: R1–6, R7, and R8. In addition they have simple eyes, ocelli, with another type of photoreceptor. The role of each type of receptor and the possible interaction of their inputs were examined in an innate visual preference task, fast walking phototaxis. Flies were found to be attracted to light, i.e., positively phototactic. We compared the strength of the photopositive response and the spectral preference of normal fly strains and mutant fly strains lacking functional ocelli, R1–6, or R7, singly or in combination. Electroretinographic measures were used to confirm the specificity of deficits in visual mutant strains and the normal functioning of intact receptors.

The strength of the photopositive response was strong, as indicated by the high correlation between increases in the intensity of the variable stimulus and increasing numbers of flies attracted toward it. Nearly all strains with or without intact receptor types showed high correlations whether the constant intensity stimulus offered as the alternative choice was bright 467 nm light (Figs. 1 and 2) or dim 572 nm light (Figs. 3 and 4). These constant stimuli were selected so that data in relevant intensity ranges of receptor function would be obtained. An important exception to the high correlations in the intensityresponse functions occurred with flies lacking function in all receptor types except R8; their positive phototaxis was extremely weak in dim light (Fig. 3).

Analyses of the phototactic spectral sensitivities (Figs. 5 and 6), as well as comparisons with known electrophysiological spectral sensitivities, were used to determine the inputs from compound eye receptors and to demonstrate central interaction of these inputs with ocellar input. Several experiments with converging evidence suggest that R7 (when present) and R8 dominate fast phototaxis in the conditions of our experiment. R1–6 is the predominant compound eye receptor type in ERG measures; however, its behavioral input is clearly demonstrated only as enhancing R8 dominance of phototaxis in experiments using a dim constant stimulus and as enhancing R7 dominance of phototaxis in experiments using a bright constant stimulus. Similarly, the presence of ocellar receptors also facilitates R8 input in dim light and R7 input in bright light. The data substantiating these respective conclusions are: (1) a lack of dim light phototaxis in a mutant strain with only R8 functional (Fig. 3); and (2) a lack of an ultraviolet (UV) maximum from R7 in bright light phototaxis in a mutant strain with only R7 and R8 functional (Fig. 5c).

Generally, absence of the ocelli and R1–6 had remarkably little effect on fast phototactic behavior except for the interaction with R7 and R8 inputs. This interaction is consistent with a theory that ocelli serve to modulate compound eye sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERG :

electroretinogram

PDA :

prolonged depolarizing afterpotential

R (1–6, 7, 8):

retinular cell(s)

UV :

ultraviolet

References

  • Barlow, R.B., Bolanowski, S.J., Brochman, M.L.: Efferent optic nerve fibers mediate circadian rhythms in theLimulus eye. Science197, 86–89 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertholf, L.M.: The extent of the spectrum forDrosophila and the distribution of stimulative efficiency in it. Z. Vergl. Physiol.18, 32–64 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozler, E.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Funktion der Stirnaugen der Insekten. Z. Vergl. Physiol.3, 145–182 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Ortega, J.A., Jürgens, G., Hofbauer, A.: Cell clones and pattern formation: Studies on sevenless, a mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch.186, 27–50 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T., Land, M.: Visual control of flight behavior in the hoverfly,Syritta pipiens L. J. Comp. Physiol.99, 1–66 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, P.B.: The functions of the ocelli ofCalliphora (Diptera) andLocusta (Orthoptera). J. Exp. Biol.32, 217–237 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, W.W.:Drosophila. In: Methods in developmental biology. Witt, F.H., Wessels, N.K. (eds.). New York: Thomas Crowell 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, H., Bishop, L.G.: Anatomical and physiological properties of the third optic ganglion ofPhaenicia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae). J. Comp. Physiol.126, 57–86 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, K.F.: Simultaneous and successive colour contrast expressed in “slow” phototactic behaviour of walkingDrosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol.130, 161–171 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, K.F., Reichert, H.: Interactions of visual subsystems inDrosophila melanogaster: A behavioural genetic analysis. Biol. Beh.3, 305–317 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Etude optique in vivo des élélements photorécepteurs dans l'oeil composé deDrosophila. Kybernetik8, 1–13 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, T.H.: Do flies have a red receptor? J. Gen. Physiol.49, 265–287 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C.S., Williams, J.L.D.: Anatomy of locust ocellar interneurons. II. The small interneurons. Cell Tiss. Res.175, 203–225 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.J.: The structure and function of the insect dorsal ocellus. Adv. Insect Physiol.7, 97–195 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, K.: Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der FruchtfliegeDrosophila. Kybernetik2, 77–92 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.L.: Honey bee recruitment: The dance-language controversy. Science189, 685–693 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadler, N.: Genetic influence on phototaxis inDrosophila melanogaster. Biol. Bull.126, 264–273 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, R.G.: Electrophysiological properties of R7 and R8 in Dipteran retina. Z. Naturforsch.32c, 887–889 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S.: Hereditary retinal degeneration inDrosophila melanogaster: A mutant defect associated with the phototransduction process. J. Gen. Physiol.69, 261–291 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W.A., Stark, W.S., Walker, J.A.: Genetic dissection of the photoreceptor system in the compound eye ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Physiol.256, 415–439 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzeller, T.: Second-order ocellar neurons in the brain of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Cell Tiss. Res.171, 91–99 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., Buchner, E.: The role of retinula cell types in visual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol.117, 127–162 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G.A., Scholes, J.H., Shaw, S., Tunstall, J.: Extracellular recordings from single neurons in the optic lobe and brain of the locust. In: The physiology of the insect nervous system. Treherne, J.E., Beament, J.W.L. (eds.). London, New York: Academic Press 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotta, Y., Benzer, S.: Genetic dissection of theDrosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA67, 1156–1165 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K.G., Reichert, H., Stark, W.S.: Electrophysiological characterization ofDrosophila ocelli. J. Comp. Physiol.126, 15–24 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K.G., Stark, W.S.: Specific receptor input into spectral preference inDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.121, 24–252 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K.G., Willmund, R., Folkers, E., Fischbach, K.F., Spatz, H.Ch.: T-maze phototaxis ofDrosophila melanogaster and several mutants in the visual systems. J. Comp. Physiol.116, 209–225 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander, R., Barry, C.K.: Die phototaktische Gegenkopplung von Stirnocellen und Facettenaugen in der Phototropotaxis der Heuschrecken und Grillen (Saltatoptera:Locusta migratoria undGryllus bimaculatus). Z. Vergl. Physiol.57, 432–458 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W.B.: Dorsal light receptors. Nature215, 305–307 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: Aufnahme und Verarbeitung optischer Daten im Komplexauge von Insekten. Naturwissenschaften58, 201–209 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K.: The function of photostable pigments in fly photoreceptors. Biophys. Struct. Mechanism5, 117–128 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Optische Eigenschaften der Ommatidien im Komplexauge vonMusca. Kybernetik5, 47–52 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, H.: Efferent system of the lateral ocellus in the dragonfly: Its relationships with the ocellar afferent units, the compound eyes, and the wing sensory system. J. Comp. Physiol.125, 341–349 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.: On the anomalous response ofDrosophila pseudoobscura to light. Am. Nat.93, 321–329 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D.L., Grell, E.H.: Genetic variation ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication No. 627 (1968)

  • Médioni, J.: Mise en évidence et évaluation d'un “effet de stimulation” du aux ocelles frontaux dans le phototropisme deDrosophila melanogaster. Meigen. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris153, 1587–1590 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Minke, B., Wu, C.-F., Pak, W.L.: Isolation of light induced response of the central retinula cells from the electroretinogram ofDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.98, 345–355 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierantoni, R.: A look into the cock-pit of the fly. Cell Tiss. Res.171, 101–122 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, W., Poggio, T.: Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. I.A quantitative analysis. Q. Rev. Biophys.9, 311–375 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell, R., Seiger, M.: Phototaxis inDrosophila: A critical evaluation. Am. Sci.61, 339–345 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, W.A.H.: Visual pigments in man. Sci. Am.207, 120–132 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schricker, B.: Die Orientierung der Honigbiene in der Dämmerung. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der Ocellenfunktion bei Bienen. Z. Vergl. Physiol.49, 420–458 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B.: Die neuronale Organisation in den Ocellen vonDrosophila. Thesis, Freiburg (1975)

  • Schümperli, R.: Evidence for colour vision inDrosophila melanogaster through spontaneous phototactic choice behavior. J. Comp. Physiol.86, 77–94 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S.: Diet, vitamin A and vision inDrosophila. Dros. Inform. Serv.52, 47–48 (1977a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S.: Sensitivity and adaptation in R7, an ultraviolet photoreceptor in theDrosophila retina. J. Comp. Physiol.115, 47–59 (1977b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S., Wasserman, G.S.: Wavelength-specific ERG characteristics of pigmented- and white-eyed strains ofDrosophila. J. Comp. Physiol.91, 427–441 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S., Ivanyshyn, A., Hu, K.G.: Spectral sensitivities and photopigments in adaptation of fly visual receptor. Naturwissenschaften63, 513–518 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W.S., Hu, K.G., Srygley, R.B.: Comparisons of phototaxis properties in differing mazes. Dros. Inform. Serv. (in press) (1979)

  • Strausfeld, N.J.: Atlas of an insect brain. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Taddei-Ferretti, C., Fernandez Perez de Talens, A.: Landing reaction ofMusca domestica. Z. Naturforsch.28c, 568–592 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, M.: Response of the imaginai disc to experimental defects,Drosophila. Biol. Zentralbl.65, 223–238 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, G.: Molecular basis of visual excitation. Science162, 230–239 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn, C.: Evidence for the role of retinal receptors R7/8 in the orientation behavior of the fly. Biol. Cybern.21, 213–220 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, W.G.: Motor responses evoked by the dorsal ocelli ofSarcophaga aldrichi Parker, and the orientation of the fly to plane polarized light. Nature London172, 1177–1179 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, W.G.: Bumblebee ocelli and navigation at dusk. Science181, 550–551 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmund, R., Fischbach, K.F.: Light induced modification of phototactic behaviour ofDrosophila melanogaster wildtype and some mutants in the visual system. J. Comp. Physiol.118, 261–271 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.: The functional organization of locust ocelli. J. Comp. Physiol.124, 297–316 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Karin G. Hu

    Present address: Division of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, 94305, Stanford, California, USA

  2. William S. Stark

    Present address: Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, 65211, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Karin G. Hu & William S. Stark

Authors
  1. Karin G. Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William S. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We thank K. Frayer, F. Garfinkel, K. Hansen, M. Johnson, R. Srygley, and G. Sullivan for technical assistance; K. Hansen was instrumental in running the experiments at extremely dim conditions. Supported by grants NSF-BNS-76-11921 and NIH-1-RO1-EY-02487-01A1 (to W.S.S.). Experiments reported in this paper were included in a dissertation (Karin G. Hu) submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Ph.D. degree to the Department of Psychology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. We thank members of the Graduate Board Dissertation Examining Committee for their comments: Drs. E. Blass, R. DeVoe, K. Muller and W. Sofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, K.G., Stark, W.S. The roles ofDrosophila ocelli and compound eyes in phototaxis. J. Comp. Physiol. 135, 85–95 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00660183

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00660183

Keywords

Search

Navigation