Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Über die Kreuzungsunverträglichkeit verschiedenerBrassica-Arten als Folge eines gehemmten Pollenschlauchwachstums

  • Published:
Der Züchter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Crosses were made in all possible combinations between the following six species of the genusBrassica: B. oleracea, B. nigra, B. campestris, B. carinata, B. juncea, andB. napus. This was done in order to determine the causes of the differences in seed set after these interspecific crosses and to obtain some methods for improving the yield. The present publication deals with several investigations on the pollen tube growth in interspecific pollinations, and the following results were reported:

  1. 1.

    The germination of the pollen is retarded, and the growth of the pollen tube is inhibited with different intensities for the individual crosses. Consequently, the pollen tubes are unable to penetrate the stigma or to reach the ovules in time.

  2. 2.

    The inhibitory effects may be weakened or strengthened by changes of the environmental conditions which affect the mutual relations between pollen and stigma. The deficiency of pollen germinations is thus eliminated by high air humidity. The inhibition of pollen tube growth depends mainly on temperature, age of pollinated flower, and physiological stage of the mother plant. It is particularly reduced by lower temperatures (about 15° C) and less remarkable in buds and, to a certain extent, in older flowers than in those recently opened.

  3. 3.

    Therefore it is advantageous to carry out hybridizations of the studiedBrassica species under cool and humid weather conditions and to use plants which are not very luxurious as well as buds which would open 2 to 3 days later.

  4. 4.

    The same morphological and physiological peculiarities of pollen tubes that were observed inBrassica after interspecific cross-pollination are also found after self-pollination of the three diploid species ofBrassica used for this work. Therefore in the discussion of our results the interspecific inhibition of the pollen tube growth has been compared with the self-sterility reaction as it is common in many cruciferous plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Alam, Z.: Self-sterility inEruca sativa Lam. J. Genet. (Cambridge)32, 257–276 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Attia, M. S.: The nature of incompatibility in cabbage. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci.56, 369–371 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Attia, M. S., andH. M. Munger: Self-incompatibility and the production of hybrid cabbage seed. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci.56, 363–368 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bateman, A. J.: Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. II.Iberis amara. Heredity (Lond.)8, 305–332 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bateman, A. J.: Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. III.Cruciferae. Heredity (Lond.)9, 53–68 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baur, E.: Einführung in die experimentelle Vererbungslehre. 6. Aufl., S. 272, Berlin: Borntraeger (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beatus, R.: Die Selbststerilität vonCardamine pratensis. Jb. wiss. Bot.80, 457–503 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, Th.: Siebenjährige blütenbiologische Studien an den CruciferenB. napus L.,B. oleracea L.,Raphanus L. undSinapis L. 1. Teil. Z. Pflanzenzücht.29, 222–240 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, Th.: Siebenjährige blütenbiologische Studien an den CruciferenBrassica napus L.,Brassica rapa L.,Brassica oleracea L.,Raphanus L. undSinapis L. 2. Teil. Z. Pflanzenzücht.31, 72–103 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brune, W.: Genetische Beobachtungen innerhalb der GattungBrassica. Z. Pflanzenzücht.28, 144–185 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calder, R. A.: Interpollination of Brassicas. New Zealand J. Agric.55, 299–308 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christ, B.: Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und physiologische Untersuchungen über die Selbststerilität vonCardamine pratensis L. Z. Bot.47, 88–112 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Correns, C.: Selbststerilität und Individualstoffe. Biol. Zbl.33, 389–423 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Darwin, Ch.: The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. S. 98–103. London: Murray (1876).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davies, D. R., andE. T. Wall: Effect of gamma radiation on interspecific incompatibility within the genusBrassica. Z. Vererbungslehre91, 45–51 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dionne, L. A., andP. B. Spicer: Staining germinating pollen and pollen tubes. Stain Technol.33, 15–17 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  17. East, E. M.: Self-sterility. Bibliogr. Genet.5, 331–368 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  18. East, E. M.: The reaction of the stigmatic tissue against pollentube growth in selfed self-sterile plants. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)20, 364–368 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  19. East, E. M., andJ. B. Park: Studies on self sterility. I. The behavior of self sterile plants. Genetics2, 509–609 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evans, H., andTh. Denward: Grafting and hybridization experiments in the genusTrifolium. Nature (Lond.)175, 687–688 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher, R. A., andF. Yates: Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. 5. Aufl., London: Oliver and Boyd (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Focke, W. O.: Die Pflanzen-Mischlinge Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Gewächse. S. 38 u. 455. Berlin: Borntraeger (1881).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glenk, H. O.: Methoden zur Sichtbarmachung von Pollenschläuchen im Griffelgewebe an Ganzpräparaten. Mikrokosmos47, 121–125 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann, W., undR. Peters: Versuche zur Herstellung synthetischer und semisynthetischer Rapsformen. Züchter28, 40–51 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hosoda, T.: On new types ofBrassica naptus obtained from artificial amphidiploids. I. A new type as a forage crop. Ikushyu Kenhyu (Tokyo)4, 91–95 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kajanus, B.: Über Bastardierungen zwischenBrassica napus L. undBrassica rapa L. Z. Pflanzenzücht.5, 265–322 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kakizaki, Y.: Studies on the genetics and physiology of self- and cross-incompatibility in the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var.capitata L.). Japan. J. Bot.5, 133–208 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kakizaki, Y., andT. Kasai: Bud pollination in cabbage and radish. Some examples of conspicious „pseudofertility” in normally self-incompatible plants. J. Heredity (Wash.)24, 359–360 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kroh, M.: Genetische und entwicklungs-physiologische Untersuchungen über die Selbststerilität vonRaphanus raphanistrum. Z. Vererbungslehre87, 365–384 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, S. H.: The effects of bud pollination on fertility and F1 fruit characters of some Chinese brassicas. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci.52, 435–440 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis, D.: The physiology of incompatibility in plants. I. The effect of temperature. Proc. roy. Soc. (Lond.) B131, 13–26 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis, D.: Serological reactions of incompatibility substances. Proc. roy. Soc. (Lond.) B140, 127–135 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis, D.: Incompatibility and plant breeding. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.9, 89–100 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis, D., andL. K. Crowe: Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity (Lond.)12, 233–256 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Linskens, H. F.: Physiologische Untersuchungen der Pollenschlauch-Hemmung selbststeriler Petunien. Z. Bot.43, 1–44 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Linskens, H. F.: Zur Frage der Entstehung der Abwehr-Körper bei der Inkompatibilitätsreaktion vonPetunia. I. Versuche zur Markierung der Griffel mit P32 und C14-Verbindungen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.71, 3–10 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Linskens, H. F.: Zur Frage der Entstehung der Abwehr-Körper bei der Inkompatibilitätsreaktion vonPetunia. II. Versuche mit radioaktiv markiertem Pollen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.72, 84–92 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Linskens, H. F.: Zur Frage der Entstehung der Abwehr-Körper bei der Inkompatibilitätsreaktion vonPetunia. III Serologische Teste mit Leitgewebs- und Pollen-Extrakten. Z. Bot.48, 126–135 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Linskens, H. F., undK. Esser: Stoffaufnahme der Pollenschläuche aus dem Leitgewebe des Griffels. Proc. kon. ned. Akad. Wet. (Amsterd.) C62, 150–154 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mizushima, U.: Karyo-genetical studies onBrassiceae. (Japanisch) Tokyo: Gihodo (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mohammad, A.: Pollination studies in toria (Brassica napus L. var.dichotoma Prain) and sarson (Brassica campestris L. var.sarson Prain). Indian J. agr. Sci.5, 125–154 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Morinaga, T.: Preliminary note on interspecific hybridization inBrassica. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan4, 620–622 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. I. The cytology of F1-hybrids ofB. napella and various other species with 10 chromosomes. Cytologia (Tokyo)1, 16–27 (1929a).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrasscia. II. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. cernua and various other species with 10 chromosomes. Japan. J. Bot.4, 277–289 (1929b).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. III. The cytology of F1 hybrid ofB. cernua andB. napella. J. Dept. Agr. Kyuschu Imp. Univ.2, 199–206 (1929c).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. IV. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. carinata and some other species with 10 chromosomes. Cytologia (Tokyo)3, 77–83 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. V. The cytology of F1 hybrid ofB. carinata andB. alboglabra. Japan. J. Bot.6, 467–476 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morinaga, T.: Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. VI. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. juncea andB. nigra. Cytologia (Tokyo)6, 62–67 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moritz, O.: Die Serologie der pflanzlichen Eiweißkörper. In: Hdb. d. Pflanzenphysiologie (Hrsg. W. Ruhland) Bd.8, S. 356–451, Berlin: Springer (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Munro, R.: On the reproduction and cross-fertilization of Passifloras. Transact. Proc. bot. Soc., Edinburgh9, 399–402 (1868).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Murabaa, A. I. M. el: Factors affecting seed set in brussels sprout, radish and cyclamen. Meded. Landb. Hoogesch., Wageningen57, 1–33 (1957a).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Murabaa, A. I. M. el: Effect of high temperature on imcompatibility in radish. Euphytica (Wageningen)6, 268–270 (1957b).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nelson, A.: Fertility in the genusBrassica. J. Genet. (Cambridge)18, 109–135 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Odland, M. L., andC. J. Noll: The utilization of cross-incompatibility and self-incompatibility in the production of F1 hybrid cabbage. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort, Sci.55, 391–402 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Oelke, J.: Zur Physiologie der Selbst- und Kreuzungssterilität beim Radieschen (Raphanus sativus L.). Züchter27, 358–369 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Olsson, G.: Undersökning av självfertiliteten hos artificiell raps. Kungl. Lantbruksakad. (Stockh.)92, 394–402 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Olsson, G.: Species crosses within the genusBrassica. I. ArtificialBrassica juncea Coss. Hereditas (Lund)46, 171–223 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Olsson, G., A. Josefsson, A. Hagberg, andS. Ellerström: Synthesis of the ssp.rapifera ofBrassica napus. Hereditas (Lund)41, 241–249 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pearson, O. H.: Observations on the type of sterility inBrassica oleracea var.capitata. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci.26, 34–38 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Riley, H. P.: The genetics and physiology of self-sterility in the genusCapsella. Genetics21, 24–39 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Roemer, W.: Fruchtbarkeits- und Vererbungsstudien beiBrassica-Artkreuzungen. Z. Pflanzenzücht.20, 377–416 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rudorf, W.: Über die Erzeugung und die Eigenschaften synthetischer Rapsformen. Z. Pflanzenzücht.29, 35–54 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rudorf, W.: Experimentell aus ihren Ursprungsarten hergestellte Rapsformen im Vergleich mit natürlichem Raps. Fette u. Seife60, 635–637 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sasaoka, T.: Karyological observations in different interspecific hybrids ofBrassica. Japan. J. Genet.6, 20–32 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sears, E. R.: Cytological phenomena connected with selfsterility in the flowering plants. Genetics22, 130–181 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sinskaja, E. N.: Geno-systematical investigations of cultivatedBrassica. Bull. appl. Bot., Genet. a. Plant Breeding (Leningrad)17, (1), 1–166 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sutton, A. W.:Brassica crosses. J. Linnean Soc. (Lond.)38, 337–349 (1908).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Swaminathan, M. S.: Overcoming cross-incompatibility among some Mexican diploid species ofSolanum. Nature (Lond.)176, 887–888 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Stout, A. B.: Cyclic manifestations of sterility inBrassica pekinensis andB. chinensis. Bot. Gaz.73, 110–132 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stout, A. B.: The physiology of incompatibilities. Amer. J. Bot.10, 459–461 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Stout, A. B.: Pollen-tube behaviour inBrassica pekinensis with reference to self-incompatibility in fertilization. Amer. J. Bot.18, 686–695 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Straub, J.: Zur Entwicklungs-physiologie der Selbststerilität vonPetunia. II. Das Prinzip des Hemmungsmechanismus. Z. Naturforsch.26, 433–444 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Straub, J.: Das Überwinden der Selbststerilität. Z. Bot.46, 98–111 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tatebe, T.: Studies on the behaviour of incompatible pollen in the Japanese radish. J. hort. Ass. Japan11, 207–234 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tatebe, T.: Studies on the inhibiting substance that prevents the self-fertilization of the Japanese radish. J. hort. Ass. Japan16, 106–125 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Tatebe, T.: Studies on the behaviour of incompatible pollen inBrassica. IV.Brassica oleracea L. var.capitata and var.botrytis L. J. hort. Ass. Japan20, 19–26 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tatebe, T.: Studies on the selfincompatibility of the common cabbage. II. On inhibiting substance. J. hort. Ass. Japan24, 168–174 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Troll, H. J.: Beobachtungen über die Winterfestigkeit und deren Vererbung an verschiedenen Rapsformen und ihren Bastarden. Züchter17, 439–447 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  79. U, Nahagaru: Genome analysis inBrassica with special reference to the experimental formation ofB. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan. J. Bot.7, 389–452 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Watkins, A. E.: Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. J. Genet. (Cambridge)25, 125–162 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Wiering, D.: Artificial pollination of cabbage plants. Euphytica (Wageningen)7, 223–294 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzüchtung der Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland

    Gerhard Röbbelen

Authors
  1. Gerhard Röbbelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Mit 10 Abbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röbbelen, G. Über die Kreuzungsunverträglichkeit verschiedenerBrassica-Arten als Folge eines gehemmten Pollenschlauchwachstums. Der Züchter 30, 300–312 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709272

Search

Navigation