Skip to main content
Log in

Note on cosmic censorship

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of recent theorems by Królak and Newman purport to prove cosmic censorship by showing that “strong curvature” singularities must be hidden behind horizons. I prove that Newman's “null, strong curvature” condition, which he imposes on certain classes of null geodesics to restrict curvature growth in the space-time, does not hold in many physically realistic space-times: it is not satisfied by any null geodesic in the relevant class in any open Friedmann cosmological model, nor does it hold for any null geodesic in the relevant class in maximal Schwarzschild space. More generally, I argue that the singularity predicted by the Penrose singularity theorem is unlikely to be of the type eliminated by Newman. Thus the Newman theorems are probably without physical significance. The Królak theorems, although based on a physically significant definition of strong curvature singularity, are mathematically invalid, and his approach cannot be used to obtain a cosmic censorship theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Królak, A. (1983).Gen. Rel. Grav.,15, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Królak, A. (1983). Note on “A proof of the cosmic censorship hypothesis,”Gen. Rel. Grav., to be published.

  3. Newman, R. P. A. C. (1983).Gen. Rel. Grav.,15, 641.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newman, R. P. A. C. (1983).Gen. Rel. Grav.,16, 175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawking, S. W., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973).The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tipler, F. J., Clarke, C. J. S., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1980). InGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, Vol. 2, A. Held, ed. (Plenum Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Penrose, R. (1974). InGravitational Radiation and Gravitational Collapse, C. DeWittMorette, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Penrose, R. (1974). InConfrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data, M. S. Longair, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Penrose, R. (1978). InTheoretical Principles in Astrophysics and Relativity, N. R. Lebovitz, W. H. Reid, and P. O. Vandervoort, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yodzis, P., Seifert, H. J., and Müller zum Hagen, H. (1973).Commun. Math. Phys.,34, 135; 37, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, G. F. R. and Schmidt, B. G. (1977).Gen. Rel. Grav.,8, 915.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tipler, F. J. (1977).Phys. Lett.,64A, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marsden, J. E., and Tipler, F. J. (1980).Phys. Rep.,66, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tipler, F. J. (1977).Phys. Rev. D,15, 942.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1973).Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco), pp. 734, 741.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tipler, F. J. (1976).Phys. Rev. Lett.,37, 879.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tipler, F. J. (1971).Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),108, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newman, R. P. A. C. (1984). Censorship, strong curvature, and asymptotic causal pathology,Gen. Rel. Grav., to be published.

  19. Newman, R. P. A. C. (1984). Persistent curvature and cosmic censorship,Gen. Rel. Grav., to be published.

  20. Penrose, R. (1972).Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity (SIAM, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tipler, F.J. Note on cosmic censorship. Gen Relat Gravit 17, 499–507 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761907

Keywords

Navigation