Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable Water Management through Flexible Method Management

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water management projects are complex and contain many dimensions, including the nature of the problem, technologicalchallenges, and political relevance. Experts and consultants in water management usually work with a limited set of analysis and project planning methods. This implies that expertsand consultants have a restricted spectrum for bidding on watermanagement projects and that the engagement of a specific expertor consultant introduces a biased approach to water management.To alleviate these limitations, experts and consultants shouldhave a readily accessible collection of analysis and project management methods at their disposal, coupled with guidelinesfor combining these methods to best approach a water managementproject. In this paper we propose a taxonomy for classifying methods used in water management. Using this taxonomy, we derivea Project Management Specification Model (PMSM) to help expertsselect, combine, and operationalize methods to match best therequirements posed by a project. The taxonomy and PMSM were derived and validated by analyzing more than 90 methods togetherwith experts in the field of water management, and by using themwithin two new project proposals made by an engineering company.We could conclude that PMSM's broad view on water managementhelps experts and consultants choose flexible analysis and project management approaches, and that it increases the involvement of, and acceptance by, all parties involved in water management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beroggi, G. E. G.: 1999, Decision Modeling in Policy Management - An Introduction to the Analytic Concepts, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enserink, B.: 2000, A quickscan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldof, G. D.: 1997, Coping with uncertainties in integrated urban water management, Water Science and Technology 36(8-9), 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldof, G. D.: 1995, Adaptive water management: integrated water management on the edge of Chaos, Water Science Technology 32(1), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, N. S.: 1997, Systemic analysis of urban water supply and growth management, J. of Urban Planning and Development 123(2), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T. A. and Gujer, W.: 1997, The concept of sustainable urban water management, Water Science and Technology 35(9), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van-Rooy, P. T. J. C., De-Jong, J.; Jagtman, E., Hosper, S. H. and Boers, P. C. M.: 1998, Comprehensive approaches to water management, Water Science and Technology 37(3), 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp, R. G., Hermann, T., Colandini, V., Terwel, L. and Geldof, G. D.: 1997, A decision network for urban water management, Water Science and Technology 36(8-9), 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giampiero E. G. Beroggi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhardi, L., Beroggi, G.E.G. & Moens, M.R. Sustainable Water Management through Flexible Method Management. Water Resources Management 14, 473–495 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011105008526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011105008526

Navigation