Summary
A comparison between a tissue solubilization method and a sample oxidizer technique to measure14C in plant and soil material is described. The solubilization method although not quantitative gives good recoveries and reproducible values of14C-content with soil samples not exceeding 10 mg and should be of value for estimating the14C-content of soils in laboratories without a sample oxidizer.
References
Burrell M M and Brunt P 1981 Ann. Bot. 48, 395–397.
Cheshire M V and Mundie C M 1981 J. Soil Sci. 32, 605–618.
Fuchs A and de Vries F W 1972 Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 23, 361–369.
Lee R B 1980 Ann. Bot. 45, 357–360.
Patterson M S and Greene R C 1965 Analyt. Chem. 37, 854–857.
Peng C T 1977 Sample preparation in liquid scintillation counting. Review 17, Amersham.
Reid J B and Goss M J 1982 J. Soil Sci. 33, 387–395.
Relcalcati L M et al. 1982 Plant Sci. Lett. 27, 21–27.
Shone M G T et al. 1974 Lab. Pract. 23, 363–364.
Shone M G T and Wood A V 1972 J. Exp. Bot. 23, 141–151.
Snellgrove R C et al. 1982 New Phytol. 92, 75–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whipps, J.M. A comparison of a tissue solubilization method with a combustion method for liquid scintillation counting of14C-labelled soil. Plant Soil 77, 381–385 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182941
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182941