Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of external potassium and magnesium concentrations on the magnesium and potassium inflow rates and growth of micropropagated cherry rootstocks, “F.12/1” (Prunus avium L.) and “Colt” (Prunus avium L.) × Prunus pseudocerasus L.)

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects (and interaction) of two solution concentrations of Mg (50, 500, μM) and two of K (250, 4250 μM) on the growth of micropropagated plants of “F. 12/1” and “Colt” were investigated using a flowing solution culture system. Magnesium inflow and growth of “Colt” and “F. 12/1” were inhibited to a similar extent by an increased concentration of K in the nutrient solution. However, the consequences of this inhibition were different. Reduced inflow of Mg in “F. 12/1” caused Mg deficiency symptoms at high and low concentrations of K, whereas this only occurred with a combination of high K concentration and low Mg concentration in “Colt”. The distribution of dry matter within the plant was significant in determining susceptibility to Mg deficiency. Since “F. 12/1” has a smaller root:shoot ratio than Colt it is unable to sustain the same concentration of Mg in leaves as “Colt” irrespective of external K concentration. The molar ratio of K:Mg in soil solutions should remain <8.5:1 in order to ensure maximum growth of “F. 12/1” and “Colt”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher C J and Ozanne P G 1967 Growth and potassium content of plants in solution cultures maintained at constant potassium concentrations. Soil Sci. 103, 15–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox W J and Reisenaur H M 1973 Growth and ion uptake by wheat supplied with nitrogen as nitrate, ammonium or both. Plant Soil 38, 36–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem B and Godbold D L 1993 Potassium, calcium and magnesium antagonism in clones of Populus trichocarpa. Plant Soil 156, 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson T and Kahr M 1993 Growth and nutrition of birch seedlings in relation to potassium supply rate. Trees Struct. Func. 7, 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat 5 Committee 1987 Genstat 5 reference manual, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 749 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammatt N and Grant N J 1993 Apparent rejuvenation of mature wild cherry (P. avium L.) during micropropagation. J. Plant Physiol. 141, 341–346.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson E J and Proebsting E L 1995 Cherry nutrient requirements and water relations. In Cherries, Crop Physiology, Production and Uses. Eds. A D Webster and N E Looney. pp 243–257. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt E J 1966 Sand and water culture methods used in the sudy of plant nutrition. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham. Surrey. 547 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipps N A, Higgs K H, Collard L G and Samuelson T J 1994 Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on the growth and nutrient relations of P. avium and ‘Colt’ (P. pseudocerasus × P. avium) in the nursery and after transplantation. Ann. Sci. For. 51, 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue E J and Neilsen G H 1986 Effect of root temperature and varying cation ratios on growth and leaf concentration of apple seedlings grown in nutrient solution. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66, 637–645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R 1973 A method of estimating root efficiency. J. Appl. Ecol. 10, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R 1982 Plant growth curves. Edward Arnold Limited, London. 248 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • MaCollock R C, Bimgham F T and Aldrich D G 1957 Relationship of soil potassium and magnesium to magnesium nutrition of citrus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 21, 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAFF 1964 Soil and manures for fruit trees. Bulletin No. 107, HMSO, London. 70 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd Edn. Academic Press, London. 889 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen G H and Kappel F 1996 'Bing’ Sweet Cherry leaf nutrition is affected by rootstock. Hort Sci. 31. 1169–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T and Grunes D L 1985 Potassium-magnesium interactions affecting nutrient uptake by wheat forage. J. Am. Soc. Soil Sci. 49, 685–690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omar M A and El-Kobbia T 1966 Some observations on the interrelationships of potassium and magnesium. Soil Sci. 101, 437–440.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor S N 1988 The silviculture and yield of wild cherry. Forestry Commission, Bulletin 75, HMSO. London. 23 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter D J and Robinson J B D 1986 Plant Analysis - An interpretation manual. Inkata Press. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyanos Y E 1995 Magnesium deficiency in cherry trees. Ph.D. Thesis, Wye College, University of London. 161 p.

  • Troyanos Y E, Hipps N A, Moorby J and Ridout M 1997 The effects of external magnesium concentration on the growth and magnesium inflow rates of micropropagated cherry rootstocks ‘F. 12/1’ (Prunus avium L.) and ‘Colt’ (Prunus avium L. × Prunus pseudocerasus L.). Plant Soil 197, 25–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse P J, Wild A and Clement C R 1978 Rate of uptake of potassium by three crop species in relation to growth. J. Exp. Bot. 29, 885–894.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ystaas 1 1990 The influence of cherry rootstocks on the content of major nutrients of 3 Sweet cherry cultivars. Acta Hort. 274, 517–519.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Troyanos, Y., Hipps, N., Moorby, J. et al. The effects of external potassium and magnesium concentrations on the magnesium and potassium inflow rates and growth of micropropagated cherry rootstocks, “F.12/1” (Prunus avium L.) and “Colt” (Prunus avium L.) × Prunus pseudocerasus L.). Plant and Soil 225, 73–82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026596612035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026596612035

Navigation