Skip to main content
Log in

Differential expression of two tomato lactate dehydrogenase genes in response to oxygen deficit

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different cDNAs encoding lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were isolated from a library of hypoxically treated tomato roots and sequenced. The use of gene-specific probes on northern blots showed that Ldh2 mRNA was predominant in well-oxygenated roots and levels remained stable upon oxygen deficit; in contrast, Ldh1 mRNA accumulated to high levels within 2 h of hypoxia or anoxia. Immunoblot analyses of native gels using a polyclonal antiserum raised against an LDH1 fusion protein indicated that LDH2 homotetramer was the major isoform present in aerobic roots. Levels of both LDH1 and LDH2 subunits increased during an 18 h hypoxic treatment, together with a 5-fold rise in activity. These results suggest that the regulation of ldh1 expression is primarily at the transcriptional level while that of ldh2 is post-transcriptional. Increases in Ldh1 mRNA and LDH activity were not correlated with lactic acid production, which was maximal at the onset of anoxia in unacclimated roots and then declined. Taken together, our results indicate that LDH2 present in aerobic roots is principally responsible for lactic acid production occurring transiently upon imposition of anoxia. Possible physiological roles for LDH1 are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson GR, Farkas BK: The major anoxic stress response protein p34 is a distinct lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 27: 2187–2193 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson LE, Li D, Prakash N, Stevens FJ: Three enzymes of carbonmetabolism or their antigenic analogs in pea leaf nuclei. Plant Physiol 108: 659–667 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asker H, Davies DD: The physiological role of the isozymes of lactate dehydrogenase in potatoes. Planta 161: 272–280 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouny JM, Saglio PH: Glycolytic flux and hexokinase activites in anoxic maize root tips acclimated by hypoxic pre-treatment. Plant Physiol 111: 187–194 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford M: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bucher M, Brändle R, Kuhlemeier C: Ethanolic fermentation in transgenic tobacco expressing Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase. EMBO J 13: 2755–2763 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cattaneo A, Biocca S, Corvaja N, Calissano P: Nuclear localization of a lactic dehydrogenase with single-strand DNA-binding properties. Exp Cell Res 161: 130–140 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christopher ME, Good AG: Characterization of hypoxically inducible lactate dehydrogenase in maize. Plant Physiol 112: 1015–1022 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies DD, Grego S, Kenworthy P: The control of the production of lactate and ethanol by higher plants. Planta 118: 297–310 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: version II, Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dolferus R, Jacobs M, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES: Differential interactions of promoter elements in stress responses of the Arabidopsis Adh gene. Plant Physiol 105: 1075–1087 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolferus R, Ellis M, de Bruxelles G, Trevaskis B, Hoeren F: Strategies of gene action in Arabidopsis during hypoxia. Ann of Bot (Suppl A) 79: 21–31 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox TC, Mujer CV, Andrews DL, Williams AS, Cobb BG, Kennedy RA, Rumpho ME: Identification and gene expression of anaerobically induced enolase in Echinochloa phyllopogon and Echinochloa crus-pavonis. Plant Physiol 109: 433–443 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallie DR: Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 77–105 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Germain V, Ricard B, Raymond P, Saglio PH: The role of sugars, hexokinase and sucrose synthase in the determination of anoxic tolerance in tomato roots. Plant Physiol, in press (1997).

  16. Good AG, Paetkau DH: Identification and characterization of a hypoxically induced maize lactate dehydrogenase gene. Plant Mol Biol 19: 693–697 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson AD, Jacobsen JV: Control of lactate dehydrogenase, lactate glycolysis and a-amylase by O2 deficit in barley aleurone layers. Plant Physiol 75: 566–572 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman NE, Hondred D, Hanson AD, Brown AHD: Lactate dehydrogenase in barley: polymorphism and genetic basis. J Hered 79: 110–114 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hondred D, Hanson AD: Hypoxically inducible barley lactate dehydrogenase: cDNA cloning and molecular analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7300–7304 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson J, Cobb BG, Drew MC: Hypoxic induction of anoxia tolerance in roots of Zea mays. Plant Physiol 91: 837–841 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li T, Takano T, Matsumura H, Taketa G: Molecular cloning of rice lactate dehydrogenase cDNA. Jpn J Breed 43: 129–133 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mayr U, Hensel R, Kandler O: Subunit composition and substrate binding region of potato L-lactate dehydrogenase. Phytochemistry 21: 627–631 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. McElfresh KC, Chourey PS: Anaerobiosis induces transcription but not translation of sucrose synthase in maize. Plant Physiol 87: 542–546 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ratcliffe RG: In vivo NMR studies of the metabolic response of plant tissues to anoxia. Ann of Bot 79 (Suppl A): 39–48 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ricard B, Coué I, Raymond P, Saglio PH, Saint-Ges V, Pradet A: Plant metabolism under hypoxia and anoxia. Plant Physiol Biochem 32: 1–10 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rivoal J, Hanson AD: Metabolic control of anaerobic glycolysis. Plant Physiol 106: 1179–1185 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts JKM, Chang K, Webster C, Callis J, Walbot V: Dependence of ethanolic fermentation, cytoplasmic pH regulation, and viability on the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase in hypoxic maize root tips. Plant Physiol 89: 1275–1278 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sachs MM, Subbaiah CC, Saab IN: Anaerobic gene expression and flooding tolerance in maize. J Exp Bot 47: 1–15 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saglio PH, Drew MC, Pradet A: Metabolic acclimation to anoxia induced by low (2–4 kPa) partial pressure oxygen pretreatment (hypoxia) in root tips of Zea mays. Plant Physiol 86: 61–66 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saglio PH, Raymond P, Pradet A: Metabolic activity and energy charge of excised maize root tips under anoxia. Plant Physiol 66: 1053–1057 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Saglio PH, Pradet A: Soluble sugars, respiration and energy charge during aging of excised maize root tips. Plant Physiol 66: 516–519 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schweisguth A, Majer CV, Fox TC, Rumpho ME: Is the anaerobic stress protein enolase a general stress protein? Plant Physiol 108: 2, S11 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Verwoerd TC, Dekker BMM, Hoekema A: A small-scale procedure for the rapid isolation of plant RNAs. Nucl Acids Res 17: 2362 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Germain, V., Raymond, P. & Ricard, B. Differential expression of two tomato lactate dehydrogenase genes in response to oxygen deficit. Plant Mol Biol 35, 711–721 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005854002969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005854002969

Navigation