Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivation levels in pupils project work: observations from an action research programme with particular reference to groupwork

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The new Proposals for Technology for England and Wales (DFE December 1992) suggest Design and Make Tasks (DMTs) ie. project work as being the major method of Design and Technology learning. This article has been primarily concerned with questions of motivation within project work but has touched on other-fundamental aspects. As a teaching/learning technique group project work has limitations as indicated above. However it would appear that many teachers do not recognise these limitations and produce poor practice. An example would be the frequent failure to use end of lesson debriefs to share individual's experience and to reflect. It is important that we now begin to develop a clearer understanding of project work as a learning experience. The DFE document offers little guidance; more research and debate is necessary to identify the assumptions and put forward practical advice on how to maximise the potential benefits of project work in Design and Technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Adams, R.J. (1977). The Development of a Simulation Game for Library User Education. MLS thesis, Loughborough University of Technology. Leics.

  • Adey, P. Shayer, M. Yates C. (1990). Better learning. A report from the Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE) Project. Centre for Educational Studies, King's College, University of London

  • Barlex, D. (1987). Technology in schools — Part B. Project Work: Case Studies. Open University ET 887/897 module 4, Units 5 and 6

  • CowieH. and RudduckJ. (1988). Co-operative Group Work—An Overview. British Petroleum: London

    Google Scholar 

  • DentonH.G. (1991). The simulation of commercial design as an integrative strategy in National Curriculum Technology: some observations from the literature and fieldword. The forth National Conference in Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development. Loughborough University of Technology. Loughborough. Leics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, G.H. (1992). Towards maximising pupil endeavour: An enquiry into a learning approach centred on teamwork and simulation in the context of Technology education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Loughbourough University of Technology. Leics-

  • Department of Education and Science (DES) (1987). Craft, Design and Technology from 5–16. Curriculum Matters 9. DES: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J.E.; Hogan, R. and Salas, E. (1987). Personality and Group Performance. in: Group Processes and inter-group Relations 9. Review of Personality and Social Psychology.

  • Eggleston, J. (1992a). A fading flower. Times Educational Supplement. November 22

  • Eggleston, J. (1992b). Editorial. Design and Technology Teaching. 24.1

  • GlaserB.G. and StraussA.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Weidenfold and Nicolson. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-TurnerC. (1971). Radical Man. Duckworth: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1990,a). General Activity for Management Education — a Deliberate Ambivalent. Simulation/Games for Learning. 20,2, June 142–151

  • Megarry, J. (1976). Ten Further Mistakes Made by Simulation Game Designers. SAGSET. 6,3, July 87–92

  • Merrett, J. and Merrett, F. (1992). Classroom management for project work: an application of correspondence training. Educational Studies, 18,1

  • Miller, N. and Davidson-Podgorney, G. (1987). Theoretical Models of Intergroup Relations and the use of Co-operative Teams as an Intervention for Desegregated Settings. in: Review of Personality and Social Psychology. 9. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.

  • O'Neil, M. and Jackson, L. (1983). Nominal Group Technique: a process for initiating curriculum development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. (2) pp. 129–138

  • PeacockR. (1989). An industrialist's view. Conference papers. Second National Conference. DATER. Loughborough University of Technology. Leics

    Google Scholar 

  • PearsonM. and SmithD. (1986). De-Briefing in Experienced Based Learning. Simulation/Games for Learning. 16(4), 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, F. (1978) Evaluation Procedures for Simulation/Gaming Exercises. in: Perspectives on Academic Gaming/Simulation. 3, 163–169

  • PerryC. and EulerT. (1988). Simulations as Action Learning Exercises: Implications for Conducting and Evaluating Business and Economic Simulations. Simulations/Games for Learning. 18, 3, 177–187

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    Howard Denton

Authors
  1. Howard Denton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denton, H. Motivation levels in pupils project work: observations from an action research programme with particular reference to groupwork. Int J Technol Des Educ 3, 53–61 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418996

Keywords

Search

Navigation