Skip to main content
Log in

Ear:stem ratios in breeding populations of wheat: significance for yield improvement

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier studies showed that the ratio of the weight of the wheat ear to stem at anthesis (ear:stem ratio) may give a better indication of potential yield than harvest index because it is determined early in the life cycle and is not affected by post anthesis stress. These studies concluded that selection for high ear:stem ratio at anthesis may lead to further improvement in grain yield of wheat. The present work was undertaken in the field to identify lines varying in ear:stem ratio in breeding populations and to study its implications for yield improvement.

At anthesis stem length, ear length, tiller number, dry weight of stem and ear and ear:stem ratio were measured in 14 crosses on F2 single plants and F2 derived lines grown in the F3, F4, and F5 at three locations in Western Australia over four seasons. In addition, biomass, grain yield and yield components were measured on selected crosses at two locations on F2 derived lines grown in the F4 and F5. There was a considerable range of ear:stem ratio between and within the crosses studied. Although ear:stem ratio was strongly correlated with stem length, there was substantial variation within stem length classes. Ear:stem ratio had a high mean broad sense heritability (82%), whereas HI, grain yield and above ground biomass had lower heritabilities, 68, 55 and 35% respectively. Ear:stem ratio was strongly correlated between generations and sites indicating stability of this character. Ear:stem ratio had a significant positive correlation with grain yield, HI, grains per ear and per m2. The correlation of grain yield with HI was equal or slightly higher than that of grain yield with ear:stem ratio.

Ear:stem ratio offers promise as a predictor of HI and yield potential where post-anthesis moisture stress can influence HI. Ear:stem ratio measurement is unlikely to be adopted for selection purposes in routine breeding programs, as it is laborious and time consuming. However, ear:stem ratio could be used to identify superior parental genotypes and early generation selections from special crosses in terms of its ability to partition assimilate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin R.B., 1989. Genetic variation in photosynthesis. J. Agric. Sci. 112: 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin R.B., J. Bingham, R.D. Blackwell, L.T. Evans, M.A. Ford, C.L. Morgan & M. Taylor, 1980. Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. J. Agric. Sci. 94: 675–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt G.M., 1977. Response to two-way selection for harvest index in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crosses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooking I.R. & E.J.M. Kirby, 1981. Interrelationships between stem and ear development in winter wheat: the effects of a Norin 10 dwarfing gene, Gai/Rht 2. J. Agric. Sci. 97: 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald C.M. & J. Hamblin, 1976. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv. Agron. 28: 361–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L.T., 1987. Opportunities for increasing the yield potential of wheat, pp. 79–96. In: The future development of maize and wheat in the third world. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L.T. & R.L. Dunstone, 1970. Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23: 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer R.A. & F. Kertesz, 1976. Harvest index in spaced populations and grain yield in microplots as indicators of yielding ability in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 16: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer R.A. & Y.M. Stockman, 1986. Increased kemel number in Norin 10-derived dwarf wheat: evaluation of the cause. Aust. J. Plant Physiol 13: 767–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson A.C. & B.R. Cullis, 1987. Residual maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of a neighbour model for field experiments. Biometrics 43: 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjichristodoulou A., 1991. The relationship of grain yield with harvest index and total biological yield of barley in drylands. Technical Bulletin No. 126. Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J.B., 1977. Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 43: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson H.D. & R. Thompson, 1971. Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M.W. & M.F. D'Antuono, 1989. Yield improvement and associated characteristics of some Australian spring wheats introduced between 1860 and 1982. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 40: 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan K.L., K.H.M. Siddique, N.C. Turner & B.R. Whan, 1992. Potential for increasing early vigour and total biomass in spring wheat. II. Characteristics associated with early vigour. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43: 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. & P.G.N. Digby, 1987. REML-Residual maximum likelihood program. Edinburgh: Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle A.A. & K.J. Frey, 1975a. Estimates of selection parameters associated with harvest index in oat lines derived from bulk population. Euphytica 24: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle A.A. & K.J. Frey, 1975b. Application of restricted selection indices for grain yield improvement in oats. Crop Sci. 15: 544–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle A.A. & K.J. Frey, 1977. Inheritance for harvest index and related traits in oats. Crop Sci. 1117: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R.C. & E.L. Smith, 1986. Selection for high and low harvest index in three winter wheat populations. Crop Sci. 26: 1147–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique K.H.M., E.J.M. Kirby & M.W. Perry, 1989a. Ear:stem ratio in old and modern wheat varieties. Relationship with improvement in number of grains per year and yield. Field Crops Res. 21: 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique K.H.M., R.K. Belford, M.W. Perry & D. Tennant, 1989b. Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 40: 473–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique K.H.M., D. Tennant, M.W. Perry & R.K. Belford, 1990a. Water use and water use efficiency of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41: 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique K.H.M., R.K. Belford & D. Tennant, 1990b. Root:shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a Mediterranean environment. Plant and Soil 121: 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slafer G.A., F.H. Andrade & E.H. Satorre, 1990. Genetic-improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain yield. Field Crops Res. 23: 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slafer G.A. & F.H. Andrade, 1993. Physiological attributes related to the generation of grain yield in bread wheat cultivars released at different eras. Field Crops Res. 31: 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington S.R., J.K. Ransom, M. Osmanzai & D.A. Saunders, 1986. Improvement in the yield potential of bread wheat adapted to Northwest Mexico. Crop. Sci. 26: 698–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whan B.R., A.J. Rathjen & R. Knight, 1981. The relation between wheat lines derived from the F2, F3, F4 and F5 generations for grain yield and harvest index. Euphytica 30: 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whan B.R., G. Knight & A.J. Rathjen, 1982. Response to selection for grain yield and harvest index in F2, F3 and F4 derived lines of two wheat crosses. Euphytica 31: 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whan B.R., G.P. Carlton & W.K. Anderson, 1991. Potential for increasing early vigour and total biomass in spring wheat. I. Identification of genetic improvements. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whan, B.R., G.P. Carlton, K.H.M. Siddique, K.L. Regan, N.C. Turner & W.K. Anderson, 1992. Integration of breeding and physiology: Lessons from a water limited environment. In: Proceedings of the International Crop Science Congress, Ames, Iowa, USA (in press).

  • Youssefian S., E.J.M. Kirby & M.D. Gale, 1992. Pleiotropic effects of GA-insensitive Rht dwarfing genes in wheat. 2. Effects on leaf, stem and floret growth. Field Crops Res. 28: 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siddique, K., Whan, B. Ear:stem ratios in breeding populations of wheat: significance for yield improvement. Euphytica 73, 241–254 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036703

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036703

Key words

Navigation