Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation and monographic research on the flora of Tropical America

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monographs provide fundamental data critical to making informed conservation decisions. Do modern monographs, however, contribute to our knowledge of the diversity of the Neotropical flora or has most of the enumeration of species already been accomplished in older monographs, floristic treatments, and other research? How well monographed is the Neotropical flora and what is the approximate number of Neotropical plant species new to science that await description? Authors of 76 recent monographs of the Neotropical flora recognized a total of 8711 species, of which 2487 (29%) were new species described by the author of the monograph during the course of the research. The number of species of flowering plants new to science remaining to be described is estimated to be ca. 22000, or about 25 percent of the total flora. These estimates show the critical importance of the contributions of monographers to an accurate and complete inventory of Neotropical plant diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cavalcanti RB (ed) (1995) Prioridades para Conservação da Mata Atlântica do Nordeste (mapa). Workshop, Mata Atlântica do Nordeste, Ilha de Itamaracá, Pernambuco, 6–10 December, 1993. Conservation International, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation International (1991)Workshop 90: Biological Priorities for Conservation in Amazonia. Map. Conservation International, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (1994) Convention on Biological Diversity, Text and Preamble. UNEP, Geneva

  • Cracraft J (1995) The urgency of building global capacity for biodiversity science. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 463–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Forero E and Mori S (1995) The organization for Flora Neotropica. Brittonia 47: 379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodin DG (1984) Guide to Standard Floras of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry AH (1993) A Field Guide to the Families and Genera ofWoody Plants of Northwest South America. Conservation International, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Longman KA and Jeník J (1987) Tropical Forest and its Environment, 2nd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK; John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas PJM and Westra LYT (1993) Neotropical Plant Families. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas PJM and Westra LYT (1998) Familias de Plantas Neotropicales. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J, Miller K, Reid W, Mittermeier R and Werner T (1990) Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S (1992) Neotropical floristics: Who will do the work? Brittonia 44: 372–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson D, Dinerstein E, Castro G and Maravi E (eds) (1996) Identifying Gaps in Botanical Information for Biodiversity Conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT (1977) Floristic inventory of the Tropics: where do we stand? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 64: 659–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT (1985) Monographing in the 1980s. Aliso 11: 231–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT (1994) A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the Neotropics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 345: 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT (1995) Systematics, conservation, and sustainable development. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 490–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PH (1988) Tropical floristics tomorrow. Taxon 37: 549–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LB and Downs RJ (1974) Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora Neotropica 14(1): 1–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LB and Downs RJ (1977) Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora Neotropica 14(2): 663–1492

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LB and Downs RJ (1979) Bromelioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora Neotropica 14(3): 1493–2142

    Google Scholar 

  • Systematics Agenda 2000 (1994) Systematics Agenda 2000: Charting the biosphere. A global initiative to discover, describe, and classify the world's biodiversity. SA2000: A Consortium of the American Society of Plant Taxonomists, the Society of Systematic Biologists, and the Willi Hennig Society, in cooperation with the Association of Systematics Collections

  • Wetterberg GB, Pádua J, Castro CS de and Vasconcellos JMC de (1976) Uma análise de prioridades em conservação da natureza na Amazônia. PNUD/FAO/IBDF/BRA 45. Série Técnica No. 8: 1–62

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1992) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, 10458-5126, USA

    W. Wayt Thomas

Authors
  1. W. Wayt Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, W.W. Conservation and monographic research on the flora of Tropical America. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1007–1015 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857429787

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857429787

Search

Navigation