Skip to main content
Log in

Parasitism byAphidius ervi (Hym.: Aphidiidae): Preference for pea aphid and blue alfalfa aphid (Hom.: Aphididae) and competition withA. Smithi

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and the blue alfalfa aphidA. kondoi Shinji are pests of alfalfaMedicago sativa L. worldwide. The parasitoidAphidium ervi Haliday attacks both species andA. smithi is host specific to pea aphid Experiments were conducted to determine the preference ofA. ervi forA. pisum andA. kondoi at three densities of hosts using the percentages of parasitism and superparasitism, and the distribution of eggs among hosts as criteria. Also examined was the outcome of competition between the two parasitoids when exposed to the same hosts.

A. ervi attacks moreA. pisum when provided alone (no choice test) and when provided together in equal numbers withA. kondoi (choice test). There was no significant difference in the number of progeny produced by either parasitoid when a female of each species was introduced simultaneously into the same test unit containingA. pisum hosts. The effects of the pathogenPandora neoaphidis on this competition is reviewed.

Résumé

Le puceron du pois (Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)) et le puceron bleu de la luzerne (A. kondoi Shinji) sont des ravageurs de la luzerneMedicago sativa L. Le parasitoïdeAphidius ervi Haliday se développe sur les deux espèces maisA. smithi ne se développe que surA. pisum. Des expériences furent réalisées afin de déterminer la préférence deA. ervi enversA. pisum etA. kondoi à trois niveaux de densité des hôtes. Le pourcentage de parasitisme, super-parasitisme et la distribution des œufs dans les hôtes ont été employés comme critères. Le résultat de la compétition entre les deux parasitoïdes quand tous deux sont exposés aux mêmes hôtes a aussi été examiné.

Ce travail montre que,A. ervi parasite plus souventA. pisum quand ce dernier est présenté seul (“no choice test”), ou quand il est présenté en nombre égal au nombre deA. kondoi (“choice test”). Aucune différence significative n'a été obtenue entre le nombre de descendants des deux espèces quand une femelle de chaque espèce est exposée en même temps àA. pisum dans une même unité d'expérimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angalet, G. W. &Fuester, R. — 1977. TheAphidius parasites of the pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum in the eastern half of the United States. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 70, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. J. — 1990. Searching behavior patterns in insects. —Annu. Rev. Entomol., 35, 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, P. J., Thomas, W. P. &Hill, R. L. — 1979. Introduction of lucerne aphid parasites and a preliminary evaluation of the natural enemies ofAcyrthosiphon spp. (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in New Zealand. In: Proc. 2nd Australasia Conf. on Grassland Invert. Ecol. (T. J. Crosby &R. P. Pottinger, eds.). — Government Printer, Wellington, 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, F. J. & Mackauer, M. — Inter and intraspecific larval competition inAphidius smithi andPraon pequodorum (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). —Can. Ent., 116, 1097–1107.

  • Chow, F. J. &Mackauer, M. — 1991. Patterns of host selection by four species of aphidiid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids: influence of host switching. —Ecol. Entomol., 16, 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, T. H., Gonzalez, D. &Bellows, T. — 1990. Searching efficiency and multiparasitism inAphidius smithi andA. ervi (Hym., Aphidiidae), parasites of pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hom., Aphididae). —J. appl. Ent., 110, 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diman, S. C. &Kumar, V. — 1983. Host preference ofAphidius rapae (Curtis) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). In: Proc., Symp. Insect Ecol. and Res. Management (S. C. Goel, ed.). — Sanatan Dharm College, Muzaffarnagar, India, 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L. E. — 1979. Assessing competitive interactions in parasite guilds prior to introduction. —Environ. Entomol., 8, 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. M. &Dixon, A. F. G. — 1985. Plant structure and the foraging success ofAphidius rhopalosiphi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). —Ecol. Entomol., 10, 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. M., Ward, S. A. &Dixon, A. F. G. — 1984. Limitation of superparasitism byAphidius rhopalosihi: a consequence of aphid defensive behaviour. —Ecol. Entomol., 9, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, D., Miyazaki, M., White, W., Takada, H., Dickson, R. C. &Hall, J. — 1979. Geographical distribution ofAcyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji (Homoptera: Aphididae) and some of its parasites and hyperparasites in Japan. —Kontyu, 47, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, A. P., Hagen, K. S. &Ellis, C. K. — 1990. Evaluating the impact of natural enemies: a multitrophic perspective. In: Critical Issues in Biological Control (M. Mackauer, L. E. Ehler &J. Roland, eds.). —Intercept Andover Hants, 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagvar, E. B. &Hofsvang, T. — 1991. Aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): biology, host selection and use in biological control. —Biocontrol News & Inf. 12 13–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Shu-Sheng, Morton, R. &Hughes, R. D. — 1984. Oviposition preference of a hymenopterous parasite for certain instars of its aphid host.Entomol. exp. appl., 35, 249–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrien, H. &Mackauer, M. — 1990. Heterospecific larval competition and host discrimination in two species of aphid parasitoids:Aphidius ervi andAphidius smithi. —Entomol. exp. appl., 56, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrien, H. &Mackauer, M. — 1991. Decision to superparasitize based on larval survival: competition between aphid parasitoidsAphidius ervi andAphidius smithi. —Entomol. exp. appl., 59, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machauer, M. — 1973. Host selection and host suitability inAphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphididae). In: Perspectives in aphid biology (A. D. Lowe, ed.). —Caxton Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messenger, P. S. &Force, D. C. — 1963. An experimental host parasite system,Therioaphis maculata (Buckt.)Praon palitans Muesebeck (Homoptera: Aphididae; Hymenoptera: Braconidae). —Ecology, 44, 532–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W. — 1969. Switching in General Predators: Experiments on Predator Specificity and Stability of Prey Populations. —Ecol. Mongr., 39, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, J. &Gutierrez, A. P. — 1991. Differential impact of the pathogenPandora neoaphidis (R. & H.) Humber (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) on the species composition ofAcyrthosiphon aphids in alfalfa. —Can. Entomol., 123, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. &Wright, A. F. — 1988. The abilities of the aphid parasitoidsAphidius ervi Haliday andA. rhopalosiphi De Stefani Perez (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to transfer between different known host species and the implication for the use of alternative hosts in pest control strategies. —Bull. entomol. Res., 78, 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., Wilding, N., Brobyn, Patricia, J. &Clark, J. — 1986. Interference between parasitoids (Hym.: Aphidiidae) and fungi (Entomophthorales) attacking cereal aphids. —Entomophaga, 31, 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pungerl, N. B. — 1984. Host preferences ofAphidius (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) populations parasitizing pea and cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). —Bull. Entomol. Res., 74, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rethwisch, M. D. &Manglitz, G. R. — 1987. Distribution and parasitoids of the blue alfalfa aphid,Acyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji (Homoptera: Aphididae), in Nebraska. —J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 60, 557–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rethwisch, M. D. &Manglitz, G. R. — 1990. Parasitism byPraon pequodorum Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): Preferences for blue alfalfa aphid and pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and impact on aphid reproduction. —J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 63, 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. — 1937. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. V. The sense used byTrichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. —Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 122–57.

  • Singh, R. &Sinha, T. B. — 1982. Factors responsible for the superparasitic ability of the parasitoid waspTrioxys indicus (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). —Entomol. Gen., 7, 295–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. S. — 1916. An attempt to redefine the host relationships exhibited by entomophagous insects. —J. Econ. Entomol., 9, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alphen, J. J. M. &Visser, M. E. — 1990. Superprasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. —Annu. Rev. Entomol., 35, 59–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, R., Schlinger, E. I., Lagace, C. F. &Hall, J. C. — 1966. Parasitization ofAcyrthosiphon pisum byAphidius smithi, a density dependent process in nature (Homoptera: Aphididae) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). —Ecology, 47 (6), 1049–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. — 1984. Parasitoid-host relationships. In. Chemical Ecology of insects (W. J. Bell &R. T. Carde, eds.). —Chapman & Hall, London, 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bueno, B.H.P., Gutierrez, A.P. & Ruggle, P. Parasitism byAphidius ervi (Hym.: Aphidiidae): Preference for pea aphid and blue alfalfa aphid (Hom.: Aphididae) and competition withA. Smithi . Entomophaga 38, 273–284 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372563

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372563

Key-Words

Navigation