Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworms in a temperate intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthworms are known to increase soil bulk density, soil porosity, mixing of organic matter, and to strengthen aggregation of soil particles. They perform important functions in the maintenance and stabilization of the soil matrix. Historically, temperate intercropping research has focused on the above-ground benefits of adding trees into the agricultural landscape. Earthworm research in temperate intercropping systems has been non-existent to date. More emphasis on studying below-ground components, such as earthworms, is required in order to better understand the mechanisms of intercropping ecosystem function. The purpose of this study was to examine seasonal changes in distribution and abundance of earthworms under a temperate intercropping system in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Sampling occurred during the spring and summer of 1997 at the University of Guelph's Agroforestry Research Station, Guelph, Ontario. Earthworm samples were collected at various distances from the tree rows. Significant variation in both earthworm biomass and density were found between the three tree species sampled. Total mean earthworm density was 182 m-2 within the poplar rows, 71 m-2 within the silver maple rows, and 90 m-2 within the white ash rows. A marked difference was also observed in the distribution of earthworms within the tree rows and the field area. For example, total mean density within the tree rows for poplar was 182 individuals m-2, as compared to total mean densities of 117 and 95 individuals m-2, two metres and six metres into the field from the tree, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De St. Remy EA and Daynard TB (1982) Effects of tillage methods on earthworm populations in monoculture corn. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 62: 699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doube BM, Buckerfield JC and Kirkegaard JA (1994) Short-term effects of tillage and stubble management on earthworm populations in cropping systems in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45: 1587–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA and Lofty JR (1977) Biology of Earthworms. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA and Bohlen PJ (1997) Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, pp 55–180. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser S (1993) Distribution and activity of earthworms and contribution to nutrient recycling in alley cropping. Biology and Fertility of Soils 15: 16–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang BT, Akinnifesi FK and Pleysier JL (1994) Effect of agroforestry woody species on earthworm activity and physicochemical properties of worm casts. Biology and Fertility of Soils 18: 193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmins JP (1997) Forest Ecology. MacMillan Publishing Co, New York, 596 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P (1988) Earthworm activities and the soil system. Biology and Fertility of Soils 6: 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KE (1985) Earthworms: Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (ed) (1989) Agroforestry Systems in the Tropics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong CK and Huxley P (eds) (1996) Tree–Crop Interactions. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Newman SW and Cousins SH (1994) The effects of poplar (P. trichocarpa x deltoides) on soil biological properties in a silvoarable system. Agroforestry Systems 25: 111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades CC (1997) Single-tree influences on soil properties in agroforestry: lessons from natural forest and savanna ecosystems. Agroforestry Systems 35: 71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS version 6.04 (1989) SAS Institute Inc

  • Springett JO and Gray R (1997) The interaction between plant roots and earthworm burrows in pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29(3/4): 621–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan N and Gordon AM (1997) Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar–barley intercropped system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 37: 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G (1992) Biological Effects of Plant Residues with Contrasting Chemical Composition on Plant and Soil under Humid Tropical Conditions, pp 69–86. Kluwer Academic Press, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin AD, McCabe D and Protz R (1992) Species composition and seasonal variation of earthworms and their effect on soil properties in Southern Ontario, Canada. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24(12): 1451–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin AD, Tu CM and Miller JJ (1995). Response of earthworms and soil biota to agricultural practices in corn, soybean, and cereal rotations. Acta Zool Fenn 196: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems JJ, Marinissen JC and Blair J (1996) Effects of earthworms on nitrogen mineralization. Biology and Fertility of Soils 23: 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PA and Gordon AM (1992) Potential of intercropping as an alternative land use system in temperate North America. Agroforestry Systems 19: 253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. W. Price.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, G.W., Gordon, A.M. Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworms in a temperate intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 44, 141–149 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006213603150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006213603150

Navigation