Abstract
The spatial variations in the densities of adult (>1 year old) musselsMytilus edulis L. in the Exe estuary, South-west England, are investigated in relation to six potentially significant environmental gradients; distance up-estuary and up-shore, substrate softness, mussel bed topography, bed area and proportion covered by algae. The most important correlate of mussel density was the up-shore gradient, as measured by exposure time; mussels were densest just below mid-tide level. The level of recruitment of spat mussels (O yr) to each bed depended on the densities of adults already present; more spat were recruited where adults were denser. Their subsequent mortality was strongly density dependent, with the numbers surviving the winter also being related to the density of adults. Hence the population as a whole was self-sustaining and densities on the individual beds were related to the up-shore gradient of exposure time. The question of how adult densities became established in the first place is therefore discussed. In former times, fishermen laid many mussel beds over the estuary and it is concluded that, once abandoned, only those placed at or below the mid-tide level survived.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BEUKEMA, J.J., 1982. Annual variation in reproductive success and biomass of the major macrozoobenthic species living in a tidal flat area of the Wadden Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res., 16: 37–45.
BEUKEMA, J.J. and K. ESSINK, 1986. Common patterns in the fluctuations of macrozoobenthic species living at different places on the tidal flats in the Wadden Sea. Hydrobiol., 142: 199–207.
CONNELL, J.H., 1972. Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 3: 169–192.
DARE, P.J., 1976. Settlement, growth and production of the mussel,Mytilus edulis L., in Morecambe Bay, England. Fishery Invest., Lond. (Ser 2), 28 (1): 1–25.
DAVIES, G., 1974. A method for monitoring the spatfall of mussels (Mytilus edulis L.). J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer., 36 (1): 27–34.
DAYTON, P.K., 1971. Competition, disturbance and community organisation: the provision and subsequent utilisation of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr., 41: 351–389.
EYSTER, L.S. and J.A. PECHENIK, 1987. Attachment ofMytilus edulis L. larvae on algal and byssal filaments is enhanced by water agitation. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol., 114: 99–110.
FRECHETTE, M. and E. BOURGET, 1985. Food-limited growth ofMytilus edulis L. in relation to the benthic boundary layer. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42: 1166–1170.
GOSS-CUSTARD, J.D., S. MCGRORTY and S.E.A. LEV. DIT DURELL, 1993. The effect of the European oystercatcher on shellfish populations. Ardea (in press).
HANCOCK, D.A., 1973. The relationship between stock and recruitment in exploited invertebrates. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer. 164: 113–131.
HASSELL, M.P., 1975. Density dependence in single species populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 283–295.
HISCOCK, K., 1991. Benthic marine ecosystems in Great Britain: a review of current knowledge. Introduction and Atlantic-European perspective. Nature Conservancy Council, CSD Report. No. 1170. (Marine Nature Conservation Review Report No. MNCR/OR/006). Peterborough, Nature Conservancy Council.
LEWIS, J.R., 1964. The ecology of rocky shores. English Universities Press. London.
MCGRORTY, S., R.T. CLARKE, C.J. READING and J.D. GOSS-CUSTARD, 1990. Population dynamics of the musselMytilus edulis: density changes and regulation of the population in the Exe estuary. Devon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 67: 157–169.
MCGRORTY, S. and J.D. GOSS-CUSTARD, 1991. Population dynamics of the musselMytilus edulis: spatial variations in age-class densities of an intertidal estuarine population along environmental gradient. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 73: 191–202.
MENGE, B.A. and T.M. FARRELL, 1989. Community structure and interaction webs in shallow marine hard-bottom communities: tests of an environmental stress model. Adv. ecol. Res., 19: 189–262.
MURRAY, J.W., 1980. The Foraminifera of the Exe estuary. In: Boalch, G.T. Ed., Essays on the Exe estuary. Devon Ass. Special No. 2, Devonshire Press, Torquay, p. 89–115.
RAFFAELLI, D., I. KARAKASSIS and A. GALLOWAY, 1991. Zonation schemes on sandy shores: a multivariate approach. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 148: 241–253.
ROUGHGARDEN, J. and Y. IWASA, 1986. Dynamics of a metapopulation with space limited subpopulations. Theor. Popul. Biol., 29: 235–261.
SEED, R., 1976. Ecology. In: Bayne, B.L. (ed.) Marine mussels. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. p. 13–66.
SOUSA, W.P., 1985. Disturbance and patch dynamics on rocky intertidal shores. In: Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. Eds., The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press. London, p. 101–124.
VARLEY, G.C. and G.R. GRADWELL, 1960. Key factors in population studies. J. Anim. Ecol., 29: 399–401.
VERHAGEN, J.H.G., 1982. A distribution and population model of the musselMytilus edulis in Lake Grevelingen. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on State-of-the-Art in Ecological Modelling, Colorado State University.
WITMAN, J.D. and T.H. SUCHANEK, 1984. Mussels in flow: drag and dislodgement by epizoans. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 16: 259–268.
WORRALL, C.M., J. WIDDOWS, 1984. Investigation of factors influencing mortality inMytilus edulis L. Mar. Biol. Lett., 5: 85–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcgrorty, S., Goss-Custard, J.D. & Clarke, R.T. MusselMytilus edulis (Mytilacea) dynamics in relation to environmental gradients and intraspecific interactions. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 27, 163–171 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334779
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334779