Skip to main content
Log in

System identification from noisy measurements by using instrumental variables and subspace fitting

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper considers the estimation of the parameters of a linear discrete-time system from noise-perturbed input and output measurements. The conditions imposed on the system are fairly general. In particular, the input and output noises are allowed to be auto-correlated and they may be cross-correlated as well. The proposed method makes use of an instrumental variable (IV)-vector to produce a covariance matrix that is pre- and postmultiplied by some prechosen weights. The singular vectors of the so-obtained matrix possess complete information on the system parameters. A weighted subspace fitting (WSF) method is then applied to the aforementioned singular vectors to consistently estimate the parameters of the system. The IV-WSF technique suggested herein is noniterative and easy to implement, and has a small computational burden. The asymptotic distribution of its estimation errors is derived and the result is used to motivate the choice of the weighting matrix in the WSF step and also to predict the estimation accuracy. Numerical examples are included to illustrate the performance achievable by the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. D. O. Anderson and M. Deistler, Identifiability in dynamic errors-in-variables models,Journal of Time Series Analysis 5: 1–13, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Begheli, R. P. Guidorzi, and U. Soverini, The Frisch scheme in dynamic system identification,Automatica 26(1):171–176, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan,Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, second edition, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Ljung,System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Mardia, J. Kent, and J. Bibby,Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Söderström, Identification of the stochastic linear systems in presence of input noise,Automatica, 17:713–725, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Söderström and P. Stoica,Instrumental Variable Methods for System Identification, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Söderström and P. Stoica,System Identification, Prentice-Hall International, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Stoica and M. Cedervall, An Eigenvalue-based detection test for array signal processing in unknown correlated noise fields, in:Proc. of the 13th World Congress of IFAC, July 1996, San Fransisco, CA, to be published.

  10. P. Stoica, M. Cedervall, and A. Eriksson, Combined instrumental variable and subspace fitting approach to parameter estimation of noisy input-output systems,IEEE Trans. on Signal Process. 43(10), 2386–2397, Oct. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Stoica and A. Nehorai, MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramér-Rao bound,IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ASSP-37(5):720–741, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Stoica and A. Nehorai, Performance study of conditional and unconditional direction-of-arrival estimation,IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, SP-38(10):1783–1795, Oct. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Stoica and K. C. Sharman, Maximum likelihood methods for direction-of-arrival estimation,IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ASSP-38(7):1132–1143, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. van Huffel and J. Vandewalle,The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. E. Wellstead, An instrumental product moment test for model order estimation,Automatica, 14:89–91, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. M. Wong, Q. Wu, and P. Stoica, Application of generalised correlation decomposition to array processing in unknown noise environments, in S. Haykin, editor,Advances of Spectrum Analysis and Array Processing, vol. III, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Q. Wu and K. M. Wong, Estimation of the directions of arrival of signals, in:Acoustic Signal Processing for Ocean Exploration, J.M.F. Moura and I.M.G. Lourtie, eds, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Germany, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Q. Wu, K. M. Wong, and J. P. Reilly, Maximum likelihood estimation for array processing in unknown noise environments, inProc. of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 5, 241–244, Mar. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Young,Recursive Estimation and Time Series Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Young, A. Jakeman, and R. McMurtrie, An instrumental variable method for model order identification,Automatica, 14:281–294, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work has been supported by the Swedish Research Council of Engineering Sciences under contract 93-669 and by the Göran Gustafsson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cedervall, M., Stoica, P. System identification from noisy measurements by using instrumental variables and subspace fitting. Circuits Systems and Signal Process 15, 275–290 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183780

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183780

Keywords

Navigation