Skip to main content
Log in

Antioxidant survey to assess antagonism to redox stress using a prokaryotic and an eukaryotic system

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a prokaryote (Escherichia coli) and a metazoa-resembling eukaryote (Ochromonas danica), we surveyed antioxidants which might overcome redox stress imposed by menadione sodium bisulphite (MD) and buthionine sulphoximine (BSO). BSO oxidant stress was evident only inO. danica; MD oxidant stress was evident in both organisms. Glutathione, its precursors, e.g. cysteine, homocysteine, and 2-oxo-4-thiazolidine carboxylic acid, and red blood cells, emerged as prime antioxidants for relieving BSO and MD oxidant stress. BSO and MD oxidant activity and antioxidant-annulling effect inO. danica were judged comparable to those found in animal cells whereas the resultsE. coli were not entirely equivalent. TheO. danica system emerged as a practical, rapid, and useful system for pinpointing oxidant stressors and antioxidants, and shows promise for studies with mammalian systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MD:

menadione sodium bisulphite

BSO:

buthionine sulphoximine

GSH:

gluthathione

GSSG:

gluthathione disulphide

NAC:

N-acetyl-L-cysteine

OTC:

2-oxo-4-thiazolidine carboxylic acid

DTT:

dithiothreitol

References

  1. Diplock, A. T., Molec. Aspects Med.15 (1994) 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Halliwell, B., Nutr. Revs.52 (1994) 253.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meister, A., Pharmac. Ther.51 (1991) 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winterbourn, C. C., and Metodiewa, D., Archs Biochem. Biophys.314 (1994) 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jerstrom, B., Morgenstern, R., and Moldeus, P., Basic Life Sci.61 (1993) 127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, S. J., Gosky, D., Zborowska, E., Willson, J. K., and Berger, N. A., Cancer Res.54 (1994) 4077.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nutter, L. M., Ngo, E. O., Fisher, G. R., and Gutierrez, P. L., J. biol. Chem.267 (1992) 2474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellono, G., Mirabelli, F., Dimonte, D., Richelmi, P., Thor, H., Orrenius, C., and Orrenius, S., Biochem. Pharmac.36 (1987) 1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akman, S. A., Dietrich, M., Chlebowski, R., Limberg, P., and Block, J. B., Cancer Res.45 (1985) 5257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Selamat, A. A. M., Asia Pacific J. Pharmacol.8 (1993) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trad, C. H., and Butterfield, D. A., Toxic. Lett.73 (1994) 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker, H., Frank, O., DeAngelis, B., and Baker, E., Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother.38 (1994) 2458.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, H., and Sobotka, H., Adv. clin. Chem.3 (1962) 173.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, H., and Frank, O., in: Clinical Vitaminology: Methods and Interpretation, p. 22. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffman, J. L., Adv. Pharmac.27 (1994) 449.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Banks, M. F., and Stipanuk, M. H., J. Nutr.124 (1994) 378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. White, A. C., Thannichal, V. J., and Fanburg, B. L., J. Nutr. Biochem.5 (1994) 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavoil, J. C., Lachauce, C., and Chessex, P., Biochem. Pharmac.47 (1994) 871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellman, G., and Lysko, H., J. Lab. clin. Med.70 (1967) 518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young, J. D., Nimmo, I. A., and Hall, J. G., Biochim. biophys. Acta404 (1975) 124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beutler, E., Duron, O., and Kelly, B. M., J. Lab. clin. Med.61 (1963) 882.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dass, P. D., Bermes, E. W. Jr., and Holmes, E. W., Biochim. biophys. Acta1156 (1992) 99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, H., DeAngelis, B., Frank, O. et al. Antioxidant survey to assess antagonism to redox stress using a prokaryotic and an eukaryotic system. Experientia 52, 597–599 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969736

Key words

Navigation