Skip to main content
Log in

Pupation-temperature range in 12Drosophila species from different ecological backgrounds

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparison of pupation-temperature range was made in the laboratory on a temperature gradient (3–38°C) using 12 species ofDrosophila representing four species groups and four different ecological backgrounds (temperate-montane forest:virilis group; desert;repleta group; cosmopolitan:melanogaster group; tropical forest:willistoni group). Within groups, differences are found which usually reflect species' distributions. Comparisons of species' mating-, oviposition- and pupation-temperature ranges reveal that pupation most-often occurs at temperatures beyond those for mating and oviposition. Each species reflects a different combination of temperature effects. Individual species have different temperature-limits for mating, oviposition and pupation. Temperatures permissive for one response are not predictive of limits on other responses. Among species, temperature can affect a particular response differently. Within groups, species differences can be at high and/or low temperatures for any response, and temperature effects among closely related species can manifest themselves in one, or any combination of responses. One cannot predict which responses will be most and least limited, or at which end of the temperature scale a response will be most limited. Among groups,common, but notabsolute temperature ranges generally correspond to the geographic distributions and ecological backgrounds of the species triads. The evaluation of temperature effects on species, based on a single activity, may not be adequate for predicting adaptive strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashburner, M., and Thompson, J.N., Jr, The laboratory culture ofDrosophila, in: The Genetics and Biology ofDrosophila, vol. 2A, pp. 1–109. Eds M. Ashburner, and T. R. F. Wright. Academic Press, London 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basden, E. B., Diapause inDrosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., Ser. A29 (1954) 114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Budnik, M., and Brncic, D., Preadult competition between populations ofDrosophila subobscura and established populations ofDrosophila simulans in Chile. Oecologia58 (1983) 137–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohet, Y., Vouidibio, J., and David, J. R., Thermal tolerance and geographic distribution: a comparison of cosmopolitan and tropical endemicDrosophila species. J. Therm. Biol.5 (1980) 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Court, A., The climate of the centerminous United States, in: Climates of North America, pp. 193–344. Eds R. A. Bryson and F. K. Hare. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coyne, J. A., Bundgaard, J., and Prout, T., Geographic variation of tolerance to environmental stress inDrosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat.122 (1983) 474–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrman, L., and Powell, J. R., TheDrosophila willistoni species group, in: The Genetics and Biology ofDrosophila, vol. 3B, pp. 193–225. Eds M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson. Academic Press, London 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fogleman, J. C., and Markow, T. A., Behavioral differentiation between two species of cactophilicDrosophila. II. Pupation site preference. SWest. Nat.27 (1982) 315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogleman, J. C., and Wallace, B., Temperature-dependent development and competitive ability of three species in theD. affinis subgroup. Am. Midl. Nat.104 (1980) 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grossfield, J., Non-sexual behavior ofDrosophila, in: The Genetics and Biology ofDrosophila, vol. 2B, pp. 1–126. Eds M. Ashburner and T. R. F. Wright. Academic Press, London 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ives, P. T., Further studies on the South Amherst population ofDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution24 (1970) 507–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaneshiro, K. Y., Carson, H. L., Clayton, F. E., and Heed, W. B., Niche separation in a pair of homosequentialDrosophila species from the island of Hawaii. Am. Nat.107 (1973) 766–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manning, M., and Markow, T. A., Light-dependent pupation site preferences inDrosophila. II.D. melanogaster andD. simulans. Behav. Genet.11 (1981) 557–563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKenzie, J. A., The influence of low temperature on survival and reproduction in populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. aust. J. Zool.23 (1975) 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McKenzie, J. A., and McKechnie, S. W., A comparative study of resource utilization in natural populations ofD. melanogaster andD. simulans. Oecologia40 (1979) 299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mensua, J. L., Some factors affecting pupation height ofDrosophila. Drosoph. Inf. Serv.76 (1967) 42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mosiño Aleman, P. A., and Garcia E.. The climate of Mexico, in: Climates of North America, pp. 345–404. Eds R. A. Bryson and F. K. Hare. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, P. A., Adaptive strategies of colonizing animal species. Biol. Rev.57 (1982) 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, P. A., and Stanley, S. M., Domesticated and widespread species, in: The Genetics and Biology ofDrosophila, vol. 3A, pp. 349–393. Eds M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson. Academic Press, London 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ricci, M., and Budnik, M., Influence of temperature, density and interspecific competition on the preadult development of Chilean populations ofDrosophila subobscura andDrosophila immigrans. Braz. J. Genet.VII 2 (1984) 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richmond, R. C., Genetic similarities and evolutionary relationships among the semispecies ofD. paulistorum. Evolution26 (1972) 536–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnebel, E., and Grossfield, J., Mating-temperature range inDrosophila. Evolution38 (1984) 1296–1307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnebel, E., and Grossfield, J., Oviposition-temperature range in fourDrosophila species triads from different ecological backgrounds. Am. Midl. Nat. (1986) in press.

  24. Sokal, R., Ehrlich, P., Hunter, P., and Schlager, G., Some factors affecting pupation site inDrosophila. Ann. ent. Soc. Am.53 (1960) 174–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J., Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spieth, H. T. The virilis group ofDrosophila and the beaverCastor. Am. Nat.114 (1979) 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tantawy, A. O., and Mallah, G. S., Studies on natural populations ofDrosophila. I. Heat resistance and geographical variation inD. melanogaster andD. simulans. Evolution15 (1961) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnebel, E.M., Grossfield, J. Pupation-temperature range in 12Drosophila species from different ecological backgrounds. Experientia 42, 600–604 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955553

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955553

Key words

Navigation