1. ERDC Knowledge Core
2. Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)
3. Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) - (2/1/1961 - present)
4. Publication
5. CRREL Report

Title:	Energy balance and runoff from a subarctic snowpack
Authors:	University of Washington. Department of Geological Sciences Scarborough College Iron Ore Company of Canada Canada. Environment Canada National Research Council of Canada Price, A. J. Dunne, Thomas, 1943- Colbeck, Samuel C.
Keywords:	Energy balance Snow Hydrology Snowmelt Radiation absorption Tundra Schefferville, P.Q., Canada Waterflow
Publisher:	Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.) Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.:	CRREL report ; 76-27.
Description:	CRREL Report Abstract: In Part I a physically based model was used to predict daily snowmelt on 2000 m^2 plots in the Subarctic. The plots had a range of aspects and inclinations in boreal forest and on the tundra. The energy balance, computed for each of the plots, was compensated for differences in radiative and turbulent energy fluxes caused by varied slope geometry and vegetative cover. The turbulent energy fluxes were also corrected for the effects ofthe stable stratification of the air over the snow surface. The predictions of the model were compared with daily melts derived from runoff measured on the snowmelt plots. The results show that the method is a good predictor of daily amounts of snowmelt, although some uncertainties are introduced by changes in the snow surface during the melt period. In Part II, a physically based model of the movement of water through snowpacks was used to calculate hydrographs generated by diurnal waves of snowmelt on the tundra and in the boreal forest of subarctic Labrador. The model was tested against measured hydrographs from hillside plots that sampled a range of aspect, gradient, length, vegetative cover, and snow depth and density. The model yielded good results, particularly in the prediction of peak runoff rates,though there was a slight overestimate of the lagtime. A comparison of predictions against field measurements indicated that, given the ranges over which each of the controls is likely to vary, the two most critical factors controlling the hydrograph are the snow depth and the melt rate, which must be predicted precisely for short intervals of time. Permeability of the snowpack is another important control, but it can be estimated closely from published values.
Rights:	Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/11681/9527
Appears in Collections:	CRREL Report