Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of codon usage in mammals: Selection or mutation bias?

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new statistical test has been developed to detect selection on silent sites. This test compares the codon usage within a gene and thus does not require knowledge of which genes are under the greatest selection, that there exist common trends in codon usage across genes, or that genes have the same mutation pattern. It also controls for mutational biases that might be introduced by the adjacent bases. The test was applied to 62 mammalian sequences, the significant codon usage biases were detected in all three species examined (humans, rats, and mice). However, these biases appear not to be the consequence of selection, but of the first base pair in the codon influencing the mutation pattern at the third position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernardi G, Mouchiroud D, Gautier C, Bernardi G (1988) Compositional patterns in vertebrate genomes: conservation and change in evolution. J Mol Evol 28:7–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M (1986) Neighbouring base effects on substitution rates in pseudogenes. Mol Biol Evol 3:322–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M (1988) Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by a mutation-selection balance? J Evol Biol 1:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M (1990) The effects of context on synonymous codon usage in genes with low codon usage bias. Nucleic Acids Res 18:2869–2873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke BC (1970) Darwinian evolution of proteins. Science 168: 1009–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acid Res 12:387–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch W (1980) Estimating the total number of nucleotide substitutions since the common ancestor of a pair of homologous genes: comparison of several methods and three beta hemoglobin mRNAs. J Mol Evol 16:153–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouy M, Gautier C (1982) Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 10:7055–7074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gouy M, Gautier C, Attimmonelli M, Lanave C, di Paola G (1985) ACNUC-a portable retrievel system for nucleic acid sequence databases: logical and physical designs and usage. CABIOS 1:167–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance ofEscherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol 146:1–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemura T (1982) Correlation between the abundance of yeast tRNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast andEscherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol 158:573–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemura T (1985) Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol 2:13–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman DJ, Wilbur WJ (1985) Interaction of silent and replacement changes in eukaryotic coding sequences. J Mol Evol 21:161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata T, Hayashida H (1981) Extraordinarily high evolutionary rate of pseudogenes: evidence for the presence of selective pressure against changes between synonymous codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:5739–5743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM (1989) Evolution at ‘silent’ sites in DNA. In: Hill WG, Mackay TFC (eds) Evolution and animal breeding: reviews on molecular and quantitative approaches in honour of Alan Robertson. Wallingford CAB International, pp 23–31

  • Sharp PM (1990) Processes of genome evolution reflected by base frequency differences amongSerratia marcescens genes. Mol Microbiol 4:119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM, Li W-H (1986) An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24:28–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM, Shields DC, Wolfe KH, Li W-H (1989) Chromosomal location and the evolutionary rate variation in enterobacterial genes. Science 246:808–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shields DC, Sharp PM (1987) Synonymous codon usage inBacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res 15:8023–8040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shields DC, Sharp PM, Higgins DG, Wright F (1988) Silent sites inDrosophila are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Travers AA, Klug A (1987) The bending of DNA in nucleosomes and its wider implications. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 317:537–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe K, Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 337:283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eyre-Walker, A.C. An analysis of codon usage in mammals: Selection or mutation bias?. J Mol Evol 33, 442–449 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103136

Key Words

Navigation