Skip to main content
Log in

Perfect zero–one matrices

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A zero–one matrix is called perfect if the polytope of the associated set packing problem has integral vertices only. By this definition, all totally unimodular zero–one matrices are perfect. In this paper we give a characterization of perfect zero–one matrices in terms offorbidden submatrices. Perfect zero–one matrices are closely related to perfect graphs and constitute a generalization of balanced matrices as introduced by C. Berge. Furthermore, the results obtained here bear on an unsolved problem in graph theory, the strong perfect graph conjecture, also due to C. Berge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Balas and M.W. Padberg, “On the set covering problem”,Operations Research 20 (6) (1972).

  2. E. Balas and M.W. Padberg, “On the set covering problem II: An algorithm”, Management Sciences Res. Rept. No. 295 (1972), Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa. (presented at the Joint National Meeting of ORSA, TIMS, AIEE, at Atlantic City, November 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Berge,Graphes et hypergraphes (Dunod, Paris 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Berge, Introduction à la theorie des hypergraphes, Lectures Notes, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Que. (summer 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Berge, “Balanced matrices”,Mathematical Programming, 2 (1972) 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Chvátal, “On certain polytopes associated with graphs”, Centre de Recherches Mathematiques, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Que., CRM-238 (October 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.R. Fulkerson, “Blocking and antiblocking pairs of polyhedra”,Mathematical Programming 1 (1971) 168–194.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.R. Fulkerson, “On the perfect graph theorem”, in:Mathematical programming, Eds. T.C. Hu and S.M. Robinson (Academic Press, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.R. Gantmacher,Matrix theory, Vol II (Chelsea, Bronx, N.Y., 1964).

  10. R. Garfinkel and G. Nemhauser,Integer programming (Wiley, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Grünbaum,Convex polytopes (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.J. Hoffman, “On combinatorical problems and linear inequalities”, IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. (paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Mathematical Programming at Stanford, August 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Lovász, “Normal hypergraphs and the Perfect Graph Conjecture”,Discrete Mathematics 2 (1972) 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lovász, “A characterization of perfect graphs”,Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 13 (1972) 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.W. Padberg, “On the facial structure of set packing polyhedra”,Mathematical Programming 5 (1973) 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Sachs, “On the Berge conjecture concerning perfect graphs”, in:Combinatorial structures and their applications Eds. R. Guy et al. (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Trotter, “Solution characteristics and algorithms for the vertex packing problem”, Techn. Rept. No. 168, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. (January 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padberg, M.W. Perfect zero–one matrices. Mathematical Programming 6, 180–196 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580235

Keywords

Navigation