Skip to main content
Log in

Newton's Third Law after Newton

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newton's third law is not something which students easily accept. This is largely due to the widespread notion that the force exerted by a moving body is directly related to the speed or to the mass of the body (or to both) and not to the nature of any interaction in which that body might be involved. The aim of the paper is to identify some of the issues upon which debate took place over the phenomenon of impact in the early 18th Century. This is achieved by studying a number of the popular textbooks and commentaries on mechanics which were published at that time. Some implications for teaching Newtonian mechanics are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algarotti, F. (1739).Sir Isaac Newton's philosophy explained for the use of ladies (trans. Elizabeth Carter). London: E. Cave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R.J. (1966). Descartes' laws of motion.Isis, 57, 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbey, A. (1980). Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In S. Gaukroger (Ed.)Descartes: philosophy, mathematics and physics. Brighton: Harvester, 230–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, S. (1982). The metaphysics of impenetrability: Euler's conception of force.British Journal for the History of Science, 15, 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C. (1993). The historical context of Newton's third law and the teaching of mechanics.Research in Science Education, 23, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjertsen, D. (1986).The Newton handbook. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • 'sGravesande, W.J. (1720).Mathematical elements of physics (trans. by J. Keill). London: G. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • 'sGravesande, W.J. (1721).Mathematical elements of natural philosophy (trans. by J.T. Desaguliers). London: J. Senex.

    Google Scholar 

  • 'sGravesande, W.J. (1741).An explanation of the Newtonian philosophy in lectures read to the youth of the University of Leyden (trans. by E. Stone). London: W. Innys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, T.L. (1965). Eighteenth century attempts to resolve the vis viva controversy.Isis, 56, 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsham, R. (1739).A course of lectures in natural philosophy. London: Bryan Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, M.A. (1962). ‘Mining all within’: Clarke's notes to Rohault's Traite de Physique.The Thomist, 24, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, C. (1971). Leibniz and the vis viva controversy.Isis, 62, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, C. (1973a). The Leibnizian-Newtonian debates: Natural philosophy and social psychology.The British Journal for the History of Science, 6, 343–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, C. (1973b). The decline of Cartesianism in mechanics: The Leibnizian-Cartesian debates.Isis, 64, 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keill, J. (1720).An introduction to natural philosophy or philosophical lectures read in the University of Oxford Anno Dom 1700. London: W. & J. Innys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. (1686/1969a). A brief demonstration of a notable error of descartes and others concerning a natural law (originally published 1686). In G.W. LeibnizPhilosophical papers and letters (trans. and ed. by L. Loemker). Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. (1692/1973). Essay on dynamics (originally published 1692). In P. Costabel,Leibniz and dynamics: The texts of 1692. Paris: Hermann, pp. 108–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. (1695/1969b). Specimen Dynamicum (originally published 1695). In G.W. Leibniz,Philosophical papers and letters (trans. and ed. by L. Loemker). Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 435–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1751).Plain and familiar introduction to the Newtonian experimental philosophy. London: W. Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1729/1960).The mathematical principles of natural philosophy (trans. A. Motte, 1729; revised F. Cajori, 1934). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (1977). The vis viva controversy: Do meanings matter?Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 8, 111–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, H. (1728).A view of Sir Isaac Newton's philosophy. London: J. Hyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohault, J. (1723).Ronault's system of natural philosophy illustrated with Dr Samuel Clarke's Notes (trans. by John Clarke). London: James Knapton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1948). The study of early scientific textbooks.Isis, 38, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, W. (1988). The unfinished revolution: Johann Bernoulli (1667–1748) and the debate between the Cartesians and the Newtonians. In W. Shea (ed.)Revolutions in science: Their meaning and relevance. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, pp. 70–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, P.P. (1951).Leibniz: Selections. New York: Charles Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiston, W. (1716).Sir Isaac Newton's mathematick philosophy more easily demonstrated. London: Senex & Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, D. (1972).The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton, Volume V, 1683–1684. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (1807).A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts. London: Joseph Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: physics education, concept development, history and philosophy of science in science teaching.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauld, C. Newton's Third Law after Newton. Research in Science Education 24, 93–101 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356333

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356333

Keywords

Navigation