All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Number of Hits per Page
Default Sort Criterion
Default Sort Ordering
Size of Search History
Default Email Address
Default Export Format
Default Export Encoding
Facet list arrangement
Maximum number of values per filter
Auto Completion
Topics (search only within journals and journal articles that belong to one or more of the selected topics)
Feed Format
Maximum Number of Items per Feed
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Copenhagen : International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
    Applied crystallography online 32 (1999), S. 799-807 
    ISSN: 1600-5767
    Source: Crystallography Journals Online : IUCR Backfile Archive 1948-2001
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: In a laboratory X-ray powder diffraction study, the evaluation of the patterns of three Bragg–Brentano powder diffractometers with different monochromator geometries has been undertaken. For the measurements on each diffractometer, the standard reference material SRM 640 (silicon) and the corundum samples SRM 674a and SRM 1976 have been used. In each case, the peak profiles were fitted with a split Pearson VII function and the FWHM (full width at half-maximum) parameters and exponent m were determined for the left (lower 2θ) and the right (higher 2θ) sides of the Bragg peaks. It was found that there is a strong dependence of both the FWHM and the exponent m on the diffraction angle for the two configurations that included monochromators, whereas nearly constant values of m were found for the geometrically simplest diffractometer working without a monochromator. Finally, the two components of the Cu Kα doublet show systematically different peak profiles. There is a clear difference not only concerning the FWHM, which becomes more obvious at higher 2θ values, but also in the course of m with respect to the diffraction angle for the left and the right tails of the powder reflections. This is the main reason for the difficulties in Kα2 stripping and also in single-line-profile analysis when using the Kα doublet. Therefore, it is not surprising that this phenomenon, which can be explained by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, does affect the reliability (represented by standard R values) of structure refinement by the Rietveld method.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...