ISSN:
0730-2312
Keywords:
osteoblast differentiation
;
gene regulation
;
signal transduction pathways
;
osteocalcin
;
bHLH proteins
;
Life and Medical Sciences
;
Cell & Developmental Biology
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Medicine
Notes:
Control of osteoblast growth and development can be characterized from receptor mediated events to nuclear messengers controlling gene transcription. From this analysis it is possible to formulate a model to explain the reciprocal relationship between growth and differentiation as well as differential cytokine modulation of osteoblast function. Central to this model are putative tissue specific transcriptional switches (possibly of the bHLH gene superfamily) that may repress proliferation and permit the regulation of mature osteoblast phenotypic characteristics. This model proposes that in post-mitotic differentiated osteoblasts, tissue specific transcription factors determine the capacity to express osteoblastic characteristic, whereas receptor activated signalling cascades, namely, cAMP/protein kinase A, receptor serine/threonine kinase, and vitamin D receptor-dependent pathways, regulate mature osteoblast-specific gene expression. Activated differentiation switches also may feedback to transcriptionally repress proliferation. Conversely, in preosteoblasts, in which differentiation switches are turned off, distinct signalling cascades involving tyrosine kinases, PKC, and calcium/calmodulin regulate proliferation. Proliferating preosteoblasts also exhibit negative modulation of maturation either through inactivation of putative tissue-specific transcription factors and/or through AP-1 dependent phenotype suppression of genes expressed in mature osteoblast. Thus, the final outcome of transcriptional regulation of osteoblast function results from complex interactions between signalling pathways and permissive differentiating transcription factors. Though many aspects of this model remain speculative and require confirmation, it serves as a useful conceptual framework to further investigate the differential control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation that may lead to improved pharmacologic ways to manipulate bone formation in vivo. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Material:
3 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240550307
Permalink
