ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Plant and soil 121 (1990), S. 21-30 
    ISSN: 1573-5036
    Keywords: actual N loss ; flooded soils ; 15N balance ; potential N loss ; urea ; water-soluble N
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Abstract One day after application, urea-N remaining in the floodwater and determined as water-soluble N (urea-N + NH4 +-N) was used to calculate the potential N loss from lowland rice soils. Actual N loss calculated from 15N balance measurements using forced air exchange (airflow rate: 20 L min-1) in greenhouse pots. Conditions for variable potential N loss were created by manipulating the method of urea application and duration of presubmergence or by selecting soils with diverse cation exchange capacities (CEC). Potential N loss tended to be lower than actual N loss; the differences were, however, nonsignificant. The method of urea application that led to the lowest potential N loss from a Guthrie silty clay loam (Typic Fragiaquult) also led to the least 15N loss and vice-versa (r=0.99**). Duration of presubmergence did not alter the relationship between potential and actual N loss although it influenced the rate of urea hydrolysis in floodwater. The primary depencence of actual N loss on water-soluble N was maintained in soils differing in CEC (r=0.83**). The association between potential and actual N loss was closer for high-CEC soils (≥ 20 cmol [+] kg-1 soil, r=0.91**) than for low-CEC soils (〈20 cmol [+] kg-1 soil, r=0.85**). Ammonia volatilization could be more closely predicted by potential N loss than could apparent denitrification. The results of this study suggest that potential N loss calculated from one-time determination of water-soluble N in floodwater can be a good index of actual N loss from flooded, puddled rice soils. Notable exceptions are to be expected for soils in which water-soluble N gets lost from floodwater either before (soils with fast urea hydrolysis in floodwater) or after (soils with steady leaching) determination of potential N loss.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Plant and soil 122 (1990), S. 21-30 
    ISSN: 1573-5036
    Keywords: actual N loss ; flooded soils ; 15N balance ; potential N loss ; urea ; water-soluble N
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Abstract One day after application, urea-N remaining in the floodwater and determined as water-soluble N (urea-N + NH4 +-N) was used to calculate the potential N loss from lowland rice soils. Actual N loss calculated from15N balance measurements using forced air exchange (airflow rate: 20 L min-1) in greenhouse pots. Conditions for variable potential N loss were created by manipulating the method of urea application and duration of presubmergence or by selecting soils with diverse cation exchange capacities (CEC). Potential N loss tended to be lower than actual N loss; the differences were, however, nonsignificant. The method of urea application that led to the lowest potential N loss from a Guthrie silty clay loam (Typic Fragiaquult) also led to the least15N loss andvice-versa (r=0.99**). Duration of presubmergence did not alter the relationship between potential and actual N loss although it influenced the rate of urea hydrolysis in floodwater. The primary depencence of actual N loss on water-soluble N was maintained in soils differing in CEC (r=0.83**). The association between potential and actual N loss was closer for high-CEC soils (≥ 20 cmol [+] kg-1 soil, r=0.91**) than for low-CEC soils (〈20 cmol [+] kg-1 soil, r=0.85**). Ammonia volatilization could be more closely predicted by potential N loss than could apparent denitrification. The results of this study suggest that potential N loss calculated from one-time determination of water-soluble N in floodwater can be a good index of actual N loss from flooded, puddled rice soils. Notable exceptions are to be expected for soils in which water-soluble N gets lost from floodwater either before (soils with fast urea hydrolysis in floodwater) or after (soils with steady leaching) determination of potential N loss.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...