ALBERT

Description: The problem of time response of pressure gaging systems used with low density flows has been discussed in Ref ]4, and the effect of outgassing on pressure magnitudes was indicated in the same reference. Briefly, gases or vapors adhering to the internal walls of the pressure gaging system behave like gas sources and produce a pressure rise in the gage system which has no relation to the external flow. The effect can also occur in the reverse direction, with "in-gassing" or the action of an effective sink in the gage system as gases entering through the probe orifice are adsorbed to the walls. For given surface conditions, the magnitude of the pressure error to be expected due to out-gassing depends on the dimensions of the probe system. In the present tests, it was desirable to use the smallest possible probe to yield the lowest possible Reynolds number. The lower limit on size was fixed by outgassing effects, evaluated by the following procedure. 2.0 PROCEDURE The pumping system was adjusted to give a pressure, measured at the reservoir, of 9 microns Hg with no flow into the wind tunnel. The upstream metering valve was then opened and the air flow rate adjusted to give a pressure of 100 microns in the reservoir under steady flow conditions, The pressure read by one of the impact tubes, inserted into the flow, was measured. The upstream metering valve was then closed rapid)y, and the reservoir pressure, p0, and the impact probe pressure, Pj, were measured simultaneously at definite time intervals. Another probe was inserted into the flow and the procedure repeated, until the pressure-time data had been obtained for each probe investigated. The results for a series of tests Involving probe Nos.l, 2 and 3 are shown on HYD 2616 300 RESULTS From HYD 2616, It is clear that the smallest probe (No.3) requires the longest time to reach equilibrium. After a sufficient time has elapsed (about 180 seconds), this probe read the same, within the accuracy of measurement, as the other two, When a similar experiment was performed utilizing a probe which was one-half the size of probe No.2, it indicated a pressure, after 180 seconds, which was almost 10 microns Hg higher than the other probes. Accordingly, only probe Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 were employed in the experiments, and a time of at least 180 seconds was allowed to elapse between a change of setting and the reading of the instruments0